WORLD War II was won in the air and on the sea and not by decisive battles such as El Alamein, Stalingrad and the Normandy landings, a Scottish Academic has said.
Dr Phillips O Brien at the University of Glasgow believes that the crucial factor in the allies' victory was their ability to destroy the ability of Germany, Japan and Italy to wage war by sinking their ships and bombing factories.
He has made the claims in a new book, 'How the War was Won - Air-Sea Power and Allied Victory in World War II', which represents a major rethinking about how the conflict was decided.
After researching thousands of pages of original documents, he concluded that while the great battles had played a part, the majority of the Axis countries weapons and munitions were destroyed through the use of air and sea power.
Dr O'Brien, Reader in History at the University of Glasgow, said: "There were no decisive battles in World War II. When we look at the figures, what we see is that the daily attritional loss of equipment was far more damaging to the German army than any great battle."
His fellow author Williamson Murray, author of 'A War to Be Won, Fighting the Second World War', backed the views set out in Dr O'Brien's book, saying: "It has become the conventional wisdom that the Soviet Union won the Second World War with only minor contributions from the United States and Great Britain.
"Phillips O'Brien has written a superb rejoinder to such nonsense in a work that represents a major contribution to our understanding of that terrible conflict. It needs to be read by anyone interested in World War II."
ends
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article