FOOD companies and lack of government action are largely to blame for "unacceptably slow" progress towards tackling obesity, according to experts.
New estimates published in The Lancet medical journal suggest that children are consuming more calories a day than they were in the 1970s. In the US alone the extra eating is said to bring in £13 billion a year to the food industry.
A series of papers in The Lancet highlighting the problem of obesity and what needs to be done to overcome it points an accusing finger at food companies.
The authors claimed that the food industry has a "special interest" in targeting children.
Repeated exposure to processed foods and sweetened drinks during infancy built taste preferences, brand loyalty and high profits, they claimed.
This year the global market for processed infant foods was likely to be worth £12.3bn compared with £9bn in 2007.
Yet, few countries had taken regulatory steps to protect children from the harmful effects of obesity or implemented widely-recommended healthy food policies.
Most had relied solely on voluntary moves by the food industry, with no evidence of their effectiveness, said the authors.
Dr Christina Roberto, one of the researchers from the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health in the US, said: "Our understanding of obesity must be completely reframed if we are to halt and reverse the global obesity epidemic.
"On one hand, we need to acknowledge that individuals bear some responsibility for their health, and on the other hand recognise that today's food environments exploit people's biological (eg, innate preference for sweetened foods), psychological (eg, marketing techniques), and social and economic (eg, convenience and cost) vulnerabilities, making it easier for them to eat unhealthy foods.
"It's time to realise that this vicious cycle of supply and demand for unhealthy foods can be broken with 'smart food policies' by governments alongside joint efforts from industry and civil society to create healthier food systems."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article