NICOLA Sturgeon has rejected calls for planning decisions to be placed in the hands of an independent body.
An alliance of environmental and heritage bodies this week called for a radical overhaul of the planning process, warning public trust in the system had been lost.
Nine groups, including the National Trust for Scotland, John Muir Trust and RSPB, said ministers should consider setting up an arms-length body to ensure decisions were "truly independent of government".
Speaking during First Minister's Questions, Scots Tory MSP Liz Smith said they had raised a "deep seated concern".
She added: "Does the First Minister accept that that is a very serious issue that undermines the heart of local democracy and can only be addressed if there is an involvement of an independent body?"
Ms Sturgeon said: "The vast majority of planning decisions are already made locally by those who are best placed to consider in what circumstances planning consent should or should not be granted.
"I think that is right and proper.
"Planning does benefit greatly from being part of a democratic process, and it is informed at all stages by high quality objective professional advice."
She offered to meet the groups to discuss their concerns but added: "I don't think we should take the planning system out of the democratic process, I think that would be a mistake."
The groups cited recent decisions to permit wind farms in environmentally sensitive areas, development on green belt land and a luxury housing scheme near the Culloden battlefield site.
In an open letter published in The Herald on Monday, they said the planning system must be reformed to ensure transparency and the "objectivity of Scottish ministers".
Local authorities determine most planning applications in the first instance, though ministers have the power to intervene in decision of national importance.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article