MSPs are urging the Scottish Government to consider offering couples up to three cycles of IVF treatment on the NHS.
Patients seeking fertility treatment through the national health service are currently only eligible for two cycles but members of the Health Committee have been hearing evidence from experts who argue three cycles offer the best chance for those who are struggling to conceive.
The Government has already provided £12 million of funding over three years to bring down waiting times after concerns about a postcode lottery of fertility treatment across different health boards.
Members of the committee have now written to Public Health Minister Maureen Watt calling for an assessment of the current system and the potential impact of increasing the number of treatments offered to patients.
Duncan McNeil MSP, convener of the committee, said: "It was clear from our evidence that NHS Boards have improved significantly on waiting times for fertility treatment and that there is equity across the country.
"The Committee heard that three cycles of IVF would give the best chance of success to the thousands of couples each year who rely on IVF to conceive.
"What is less clear is how this could be implemented without adversely affecting waiting times. This is why we're calling on the Scottish Government to look into this issue."
Bob Doris MSP, deputy convener of the committee, said: "Significant investment has been made in the system by the Scottish Government and this has had a positive impact in allowing couples to access the treatment they need.
"The Committee was however concerned about the strict criteria which excludes couples where one of the partners has a child living with them in the home.
"The Committee is of the view that this should be revisited at the earliest opportunity by the National Infertility Review Group, with a view to extending provision."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article