Doctors in Scotland yesterday voted in favour of cannabis drugs being prescribed on the NHS to ease the suffering of patients.
Members of the British Medical Association, meeting in Dundee, backed a call for change in the law to allow the use of cannabinoid medication to treat disease.
Dr Andrew Thomson, a Scottish GP and leading figure in the BMA, told the association's Junior Members Forum he had watched one of his patients suffer intolerable pain from multiple sclerosis and was powerless to suggest she took cannabis for her relief because of the law.
"A lot of our patients turn to using cannabis to try to relieve their pain - let's not make them criminals," he said. "Let's not turn pain into punishment."
His patient, who has now died, was a professional woman who knew the anecdotal evidence about cannabis relieving pain. However, Dr Thomson explained that she had been a law-abiding citizen all her life and could not contemplate committing a criminal act.
He told The Herald: "She knew it would be good for her, but her morals would not allow her to break the law so she suffered and suffered and suffered.
"It was frustrating to see it but I could not encourage her to use it. I know what is best for my patient potentially but I am not allowed by the system to use what would relieve the suffering."
There is scientific evidence to suggest that cannabis may be useful for alleviating a range of conditions, including the side effects of chemotherapy, and trials of treatments that use cannabis derivatives have taken place. However, cannabis continues to cause concern as a street drug and this week a report is expected to warn that use has increased rapidly among young people despite high profile anti-drugs campaigns.
The BMA Junior Members Forum called for the BMA to lobby the government to make the necessary legal changes to allow the cannabinoid part of the cannabis plant, the active ingredients, to be researched and developed as a treatment.
The forum, which brought together junior doctors from across the UK over two days, also demanded a halt to any further private finance initiatives in the health service.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article