A haulage worker who was sacked after posting a photograph of himself in a "sexually compromising position" at work has won his case for unfair dismissal.
Faisal Auld, a former chargehand for Norbert Dentressangle, uploaded the picture to Facebook, including a comment making sexually explicit remarks about Santa Claus.
The photograph, which showed the 31-year-old and another member of staff, had been Mr Auld's cover photo on his page for five years when his newly appointed boss spotted it and reported it to HR.
Norbert Dentressangle claimed the image, which showed the two men wearing their uniforms in a sexual position, could have been "detrimental" to the business.
However, employment judge Robert Gall ruled in favour of Mr Auld, of Falkirk, and awarded him £8,083.63 as the firm had no social media policy in place.
The judge stated: "After careful analysis and consideration of all the evidence and submissions, I came to the clear view that the decision to dismiss in the circumstances of this case lay outwith the band of reasonable responses of a reasonable employer. The dismissal is therefore unfair."
The tribunal heard that newly appointed site manager Margaret Farquharson looked up Mr Auld's Facebook page in June 2014 as she wanted to find out information about their "families, hobbies or interests".
She then discovered the photograph, which had been on Mr Auld's page since 2009, and showed him "holding [his colleague] in a headlock in a sexually compromising position".
Judge Gall also raised issues about the fact that Mrs Farquharson acted as the dismissing officer when she was the person who discovered the photograph.
Douglas Jaap, of Digby Brown, the firm which represented Mr Auld, said the case highlights important issues about use of social media.
He said: "As has been made clear by ACAS and others, employers need to not only have a clear social media policy in place but proactively communicate it to their workforce.
"Among other findings, the tribunal in this case noted the absence of a social media policy.
"Given this lack of guidance, it was unfair and unreasonable for our client to have been dismissed from a job which he had held with an exemplary record for a number of years, and we were pleased that the tribunal agreed with this.
"Employers have a duty to communicate with their workplace and to act properly and fairly in any disciplinary matters, though the case does also highlight that employees need to be aware and responsible when positing on social media sites."
Mr Auld, who had ten year's service with the firm, now works as a charge hand for Aldi.
His award in the case was reduced by 30 per cent due to his conduct in posting the photograph.
The firm did not respond to a request for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article