Not getting enough sleep dramatically increases the chances of catching a cold, research has shown.
People who sleep six hours or less a night are four times more susceptible to colds than those who spend more than seven hours in slumber land, a study found.
Scientists exposed 164 volunteers to the common cold virus to test their ability to fight off the infection.
They found that poor sleep in the previous week was associated with a 4.2 times increased risk of developing cold symptoms.
Those who slept for less than five hours a night were 4.5 times more likely to start sneezing.
Lead researcher Dr Aric Prather, from the University of California at San Francisco, said: "It goes beyond feeling groggy or irritable. Not getting sleep fundamentally affects your physical health."
Participants in the study had their normal sleep habits assessed during the week before the scientists attempted to make them catch a cold.
Nasal drops were used to administer the cold virus, after which the volunteers were monitored for another week.
Dr Prather said: "Short sleep was more important than any other factor in predicting subjects' likelihood of catching cold. It didn't matter how old people were, their stress levels, their race, education or income. It didn't matter if they were a smoker. With all those things taken into account, statistically sleep still carried the day."
The findings appear in the latest online edition of the journal Sleep.
Previous research led by Dr Prather has shown that people who sleep fewer hours are less protected against illness after receiving a vaccine.
Other studies have confirmed that sleep has a significant influence on T-cells, a vital component of the immune system.
Dr Prather added: "In our busy culture, there's still a fair amount of pride about not having to sleep and getting a lot of work done.
"We need more studies like this to begin to drive home that sleep is a critical piece to our well-being."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel