Scotland's police forces can, from today, use youngsters to catch licensed traders selling alcohol to under-18s.
The roll-out of the test purchasing scheme, piloted in Fife for almost a year, is the first major national change in Scotland's licensing law in over a quarter of a century.
However, it is unlikely that any force will take up the option until later this summer.
All forces are expected to use "intelligence-led" stings rather than the more random approach deployed in Fife.
But the high failure rate in Fife and the readiness of licensing boards to close sources that have been caught out has raised concerns that thousands of Scottish retailers could have their livelihoods threatened.
The Scottish Grocers' Federation has even warned its members that the roll-out of test purchasing is a much greater threat to their survival than the growth of the supermarket chains.
By mid-March, 847 tests had been carried out in Fife, where licensing boards have operated a "two strikes and you're out" approach. In the campaign, 73 pubs and nightclubs and 71 off-licences were caught, a failure rate of 17%. All 144 have been reported to the procurator-fiscal. The number of prosecutions being processed is believed to be in single figures.
On second visits, just six failed, leading to five suspensions, although at least two, a Co-op and a BP filling station, are appealing the sanctions. One case is still pending A similar, non-statutory, scheme in the south side of Glasgow three years ago found that 33% of off-licences were selling to under-age customers.
Now, while insisting that licencees who put profit before social responsibility should be punished, lawyers, retailers and bar owners believe there will be a huge increase in the number of suspension hearings before Scotland's licensing boards.
Gordon Macrae, of the Scottish Grocers' Federation, said no retailer disagreed with the test purchasing concept but they were fearful of the way it could be implemented and called for a national proof-of-age scheme.
He added: "When rolled out we want it to be flexible enough to support retailers to put the right systems in place. Two strikes and out doesn't do that. Retailers could be have licences suspended through no fault of the company.
"It's such a serious issue many firms have made unintentional selling to under age customers a gross misconduct offence."
Some lawyers also claim that the sanctions handed out by licensing boards may be disproportionate to the offence, especially as the onus of proof is much less than in a courtroom.
Fife-based licensing law specialist Tom Johnston, speaking at a major conference in Glasgow last week, said there had been one prosecution where a licence holder was fined £225 in court, a much lesser sum than loss of livelihood for three or four months, which a licensing board can and has imposed.
Mr Johnston said: "Since the Fife licensing boards have been so compliant in agreeing with the police view, virtually no prosecutions have taken place.
"In essence the police feel they are getting a result' without the inconvenience of having to commit time and manpower to the due process of law."
Glasgow-based lawyer Jack Cummins added: "The experience of Fife and Glasgow some years back leaves me in no doubt that many licensed premises will be in front of licensing boards as a result and in serious trouble."
Some details of the approach to be taken by different forces remain to be ironed out, while teenage test purchasers have yet to be recruited in most areas.
Despite the criticisms, officers working with liquor licensing will relish having the tool in their armoury.
John Farrell, head of licensing at Strathclyde Police, said: "This is an operational tool we will certainly be using in our fight to ensure the well-being of communities."
An Executive spokeswoman said she could confirm the roll-out date but because of the election was unable to comment further.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article