HEALTH chiefs confirmed they have traced almost 60 people who had close contact with Ebola nurse Pauline Cafferkey.
Relatives, friends, healthcare workers and community contacts are among the 58 identified.
Forty people were confirmed as having contact with the nurse's bodily fluids and 25 of them received a vaccine.
However, 15 others either refused the vaccine or had previous medical conditions which stopped them from getting the vaccine.
It comes after Ms Cafferkey's family said doctors "missed a big opportunity" to spot she had fallen ill again.
She is in an isolation unit in London after tests indicated the Ebola virus is still present in her body.
The 39-year-old, from South Lanarkshire, was diagnosed with Ebola in December after returning to Glasgow from Sierra Leone via London.
A statement from the health board said: "The rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine offered is currently being trialled with the World Health Organisation and has been tested around 7000 people during the recent outbreak of Ebola virus infection in Guinea.
"It is an unlicensed vaccine, currently being trialled.
"Forty of the 58 close contacts were confirmed as having had direct contact with Pauline’s bodily fluids and were offered the vaccine in line with criteria set out by the expert group.
"Twenty-five of them accepted the vaccine and15 have either declined the vaccine or were unable to receive it due to existing medical conditions."
Health board bosses confirmed all 58 close contacts are being "closely monitored".
The statement added: "This includes a period of 21 days since their last exposure where they will have their temperature taken twice daily, restrictions placed on travel and, in the case of healthcare workers they have been asked not to have direct patient contact during this period.
"The 25 who were vaccinated will undergo additional monitoring because the vaccine is still being evaluated."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel