Margaret Thatcher has been voted the most influential woman of the past 200 years, but not in Scotland, where Marie Curie is considered to hold the accolade.
Nicola Sturgeon has been placed at being the fourth most influential woman in politics behind the late Baroness Thatcher, the Queen, and German head of state Angela Merkel, a study claims.
The survey was carried out by insurer Scottish Widows to mark its bi-centenary.
The firm employed historian and author Suzannah Lipscomb to identify the women viewed by the British public as those who have shaped society throughout the past two centuries.
The survey of 2,000 respondents across all ages, genders and regions considered the women who have had the greatest influence across various categories ranging from geopolitics to science and technology.
Baroness Thatcher, who stepped down as Prime Minister on November 28 1990, was top, but in Scotland she comes in at number two, with Marie Curie taking the lead spot.
Polish-born Curie was the first woman to teach at the esteemed Sorbonne in Paris, and received two Nobel Prizes - one for physics in 1903 and a second for chemistry in 1911.
Her research was vital in the development of X-rays in surgery.
During World War One Curie helped kit out ambulances with this equipment, which she then drove herself as part of the war effort.
Her inspiration led to the first Marie Curie home for cancer patients to be opened in 1952, based in an old property called the Hill of Tarvit in Cupar, Fife.
Emmeline Pankhurst, the great Suffragette, was fifth in the UK list but third in Scotland.
The researchers also claimed royal women are considered more influential than innovators, scientists, and politicians.
Ms Lipscomb said: "The top 10 are an impressive list of women – each of them was or has been responsible for or overseen real change, but in addition nearly every one of them has some symbolic importance beyond their own person.
“What's evident overall is that the women chosen as the top of each category - and in our list of top 10 - are not flashes in the pan."
Jackie Leiper, of survey commissioner Scottish Widows, said: "The results reflect the changing face of women in the workforce.
She added that in centuries past women were "largely excluded from the workforce, couldn’t vote and had no right to own their own property".
She said: "We are proud to reflect on the vast evolution of female empowerment during the past two centuries, brought to life by this list of influential females and the values that people feel give them that prominence.”
The study by Scottish Widows also sought to uncover the factors that people perceive make a woman influential. Respondents were asked to select from a list of key attributes those that were most likely to make a woman influential.
A far higher proportion of young people believed "having ambition" is a determining factor of a woman’s influence (27 per cent of 18-24 year-olds against 9 per cent of 55-64 year-olds) whereas older generations believed "having compassion" is more important (a quarter of over 65s selected this trait, against 16 per cent) of 18-24 year-olds.
TOP 10 MOST INFLUENTIAL WOMEN
1. Margaret Thatcher (28%)
2. Marie Curie (24%)
3. Queen Elizabeth II (18%)
4. Diana, Princess of Wales (17%)
5. Emmeline Pankhurst (16%)
6. Mother Teresa (13%)
7. Florence Nightingale (12%)
8. Queen Victoria (8%)
9. Rosa Parks (7%)
10. Oprah Winfrey (6%)
TOP 10 MOST INFLUENTIAL WOMEN ACROSS SCOTLAND
1. Marie Curie (29%)
2. Margaret Thatcher (24%)
3. Emmeline Pankhurst (17%)
4. Queen Elizabeth II (16%)
5. Mother Theresa (14%)
6. Florence Nightingale (11%)
7. Diana, Princess of Wales (11%)
8. Rosa Parks (11%)
9. Angela Merkel (8%)
10. Queen Victoria (7%)
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel