MSPs are demanding a slew of new information on Police Scotland's "spying" row as they prepare for a constitutional stand-off with the force.
Holyrood's justice committee has already called four operational officers to appear before it in what police chiefs fear is an assault on their operational independence.
However, they also want a detailed chronology of how Police Scotland came to breach new data guidelines on accessing the data of potential journalist sources.
Deputy Chief Constable Neil Richardson is seeking legal advice while he consider the MSPs' "invitation" and their requests for extra information.
MSPs on the committee say they still have questions for Mr Richardson and his subordinates on the row.
Mr Richardson, who is in currently in charge of the force, appeared at the committee this week, insisting the breaches had been a "mistake" he blamed on one officer's "misinterpretation" of new guidelines, the speed of their introduction and insufficient training.
The mistake was made when officers from Police Scotland's Counter Corruption Unit (CCU) investigated potential leaks of confidential information about a murder inquiry to the Sunday Mail newspaper.
Such a leak would be a criminal offence. CCU accessed communications data on five occasions, including, twice, phone bills without judicial authority.
Since March, police have had to seek judicial approval to identify journalistic sources.
Last month, Sir Stanley Burton, the Interception of Communications Commissioner, said Police Scotland had contravened the relevant Code of Practice on five occasions.
Police Scotland did not do any covert surveillance or interceptions, so insiders deny any suggestion they "spied" on either journalists or their sources.
CCU officers, however, check to see if some officers had been in electronic or telephone contact with journalists or their intermediaries.
This occurred 22 days after the new rules came in to force.
MSPs were not satisfied with Mr Richardson's explanation. Conservative MSP Margaret Mitchell attacked Mr Richardson over "smoke and mirrors about 22-day-old new code-of-practice guidelines that somehow someone couldn't interpret".
The committee, in a letter to Mr Richardson, has therefore sought information about how much notice the force had about the change in guidelines and when training was rolled out to officers on its implementation.
Police Scotland has agreed to an action plan Sir Stanley Burton to rectify its mistakes, which were described as "reckless" by the watchdog. The justice committee has also sought details on how this plan's implementation.
Another force, in England or Wales, also breached the guidelines shortly after their introduction.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel