Thousands of Britons have turned a blind eye to the trends for huge high-definition TVs and streaming programmes on tablets in favour of their old black and white set.
According to TV Licensing, some 9,356 people in the UK still have a licence to watch television in shades of grey, nearly 50 years after the first colour broadcasts.
But the number has reduced dramatically since 2000, when 212,000 people went without colour, while nine years ago, in 2006, 50,000 people stuck with black and white.
Jason Hill, spokesman for TV Licensing, said: "It's astounding that more than 9,000 households still watch on a black and white telly, especially now that over half of homes access TV content over the internet, on smart TVs.
"Whether you have the latest 4K TV or a black and white set from the 1970s, however, if you are watching or recording live television, then you do need a TV licence."
The first regular colour TV broadcasts in the UK were from the Wimbledon Tennis Championships in July 1967 as David Attenborough, then controller of BBC2, raced to beat networks in Germany to it.
Londoners account for the most mono licences with 2,222, while residents of Birmingham and Manchester trail with 429 and 313 respectively. The fee for black and white TV has been frozen at £49 until the BBC Charter Review next year.
Jeffrey Borinsky, a television and radio technology historian, said: "There are hundreds of collectors like myself who have many black and white TVs; some of them are purists who won't have this new-fangled colour TV in the house.
"We like the glow of valves, rich sound and wonderful warm smell of these old sets. It's simply pure nostalgia and the joy of seeing old equipment still working in the internet age.
"Older people who grew up with black and white still love it and don't see why they should throw away their perfectly good set to get colour they don't even want.
"Unfortunately even the youngest black and white sets are over 20 years old and very few people now mend TVs at all. In a few more years this group will have gone to TV heaven."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel