The next person who tells you what a clever chap Alex Salmond is should be packed off to study Overreaching for Beginners. This minority government lark could well end in tears for the SNP. If Murphy's Law kicks in, with Labour doing the kicking, they could be worse off than before.
Still, clever chap, that Salmond.
What do you do when you are slated to announce a raft of new laws but have no laws capable of independent, as it were, life? You congratulate your opponents for coming up with some fine and ingenious wheezes.
What do you do when you must act like a government without the power to govern? You lavish praise on anyone - Green and Liberal in particular - who might yet be flattered into inhabiting your Potemkin village.
Sans tiara (give it time) Salmond's opening Holyrood statement was a bit like a Queen's speech. Like HM, he cannot personally do anything much. He can recommend virtue; speak highly of consensus; and invoke the people. Then pray.
Beyond that, Salmond is playing poker. "I'm for consensus!" he cries. "Who's against me?" He wants to work with everyone, all the time, over everything. It leaves his own slate clean - why bother with manifesto commitments in the face of parliamentary arithmetic?
- and leaves the rest with a problem.
Yesterday, Salmond's policy was to have no policies. Brilliant! He even went as far as to say that sometimes, you know, parliaments are better off if they don't bother to pass laws. Legislation just annoys people. Better to have "themes" instead.
Salmond had a pair, and he played them like a straight flush. Grow the economy, save the planet: all against, say "Nay". That was what he meant, presumably, by respecting "the diversity of opinion across this chamber".
It couldn't possibly have been "the mushy ground of fake consensus", could it?
Listening to Eck - a name hereinafter to be banned from the realm - Scotland is as green as a Hibs back four. He even managed to make it sound as though renewable resources are our next North Sea oil bonanza. Be still, my "beating heart of a successful, confident nation".
Salmond reckons we can do without nuclear, reduce "our impact on the planet", match UK economic growth within the lifetime of this parliament, and become "the green energy capital of Europe". Everything else is up for discussion. Postcards to Bute House, Edinburgh.
Jack McConnell, in a businesslike and not at all bitter response, invoked a dread word: fourthly. It came fourth, strangely, on a list of consensus-building complaints about all the issues Salmond had failed to mention while "grandstanding on the international stage".
Comradely Wendy Alexander seemed to be busy finishing her homework while all this was going on.
The political point, for this observer, is that Salmond World has room still for thoughts of coalition.
Nicol Stephen - now here's a surprise - seemed to enjoy being flattered for his interest in the welfare of youngsters. He quibbled coquettishly over Salmond's green credentials, but that was all.
Patrick Harvie, 50% of parliamentary greenery, meanwhile thundered that the new council of economic gurus must surely include one of his own. That's telling them, one thought. Both men are inching up the gangway of HMS Consensus.
Hanging from the rigging to greet them were Roseanna Cunningham and Alex Neil. Here were two Nationalists falling over themselves in their "absolute delight" (Cunningham) "to welcome everything the First Minister has had to say". No more of this, please.
But did he say something? Is minority government the art of not governing? Or are we, like our First Minister, still waiting to see how the cards might fall?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article