Green councillors in Glasgow have been accused of "political cowardice" after they were absent from discussions for the future of a city green space.
During a heated meeting at Glasgow City Council's planning committee yesterday, SNP councillor Phil Greene hit out at committee members Martin Bartos and Nina Baker, suggesting they should no longer be on the board.
The two Green councillors had previously suggested to the council's Executive Committee that the North Kelvin Meadow space should be re-zoned as green space to protect it from future development.
This suggestion ruled them out of any involvement with the planning decision for the site as they had already declared their views on what should happen.
During the meeting, Councillor Greene said: "I shouldn't make this comment but I will because I'm very angry.
"There are two members of the the committee who are not here who should be.
"It is an act of political cowardice and they should not be on the planning committee."
Both councillors said they had no choice but to abstain from the committee, as their involvement would not be impartial.
Councillor Baker said: "This has been, in my view, the correct action, both ethically and indeed legally as any participation by myself or Councillor Bartos could otherwise have been liable to reporting to the Standards Commission as inappropriate.
"It is of course, nevertheless, always frustrating when our desire to see our views prevail, that the proper thing is that we have to be absent entirely as the rules also prohibit us from even being in the room during the meeting."
Councillor Bartos said: "We had previously taken a position that the land should be re-zoned for green space.
"SNP and Labour both voted against our position when we put it forward last year.
"The developers would have been able to appeal the decision on the basis we were prejudiced...It could have been in breach of the councillors code.
"To do anything otherwise would have opened us up to criticism."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel