Downing Street's behaviour would be "beneath contempt" if it is playing politics over Britain's nuclear deterrent, a senior Conservative MP has warned.
Julian Lewis, chairman of the Defence Select Committee, questioned why No 10 is delaying a vote on replacing the four submarines which carry the UK's Trident weapons system.
He asked Commons Leader Chris Grayling to look MPs in the eye and reassure them that No 10 is "not playing party politics" over the issue.
Mr Lewis has already written to Defence Secretary Michael Fallon to warn of "growing concern" among MPs, contractors and their supply chains.
The Ministry of Defence (MOD) estimates that acquiring four new submarines to carry the Trident deterrent will cost £31 billion over the course of the 20-year procurement programme, with a further £10 billion set aside to meet any additional unexpected cost increases.
Speaking in the Commons, Mr Lewis told Mr Grayling: "It's one thing for you to poke fun at the leader of the Opposition over his strange ideas on Trident's successor, as you did today.
"It's quite another for No 10 to adopt this policy on the question of delaying the vote, which everybody - from the MOD, industry and both sides of the nuclear debate in Parliament - expected to be taking place in the next few weeks.
"Can you look the House in the eye and tell us that No 10 is not playing party politics with the nuclear deterrent because if they are it is beneath contempt."
Mr Grayling replied: "You have been a powerful advocate for our nuclear deterrent, it's a view I support wholeheartedly.
"You are, I think, very effective in highlighting the flaws in the Opposition's policies.
"You will know this is a matter that it's the Government's intention that it will be debated in the House in due course.
"I can't give you an announcement on when that will happen today, but I'll make sure my colleagues are aware of the concern that you raised."
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel