Dystopian vision
The police have long had powers to stop and question anyone they suspect of involvement in a crime. So what can be the point of new police powers suggested by the government? Are they suggesting it is a good use of scarce resources for the police to spend time checking identities of people they "don't" suspect of any involvement in crime? Andy Burnham MP, when minister for ID cards, said: "It is part of being a good citizen, proving who you are, day in day out." Mr Blair and Dr Reid are clearly determined to bring this dystopian vision closer to reality.
Geraint Bevan, NO2ID Scotland, 3e Grovepark Gardens, Glasgow.
Apples and oranges
Kerr MacGregor (May 26), in comparing Scotland's potential for hydro electricity with that of Norway, is comparing apples with oranges. Norway has what Scotland lacks: abundant, dependable snow which melts slowly providing water for hydro schemes. I am full of admiration for the success of the old Hydro Board in exploiting hydro power to the benefit of the north of Scotland but it harnessed virtually all of the economically viable hydro potential. Talk of doubling our production of hydro power is fanciful.
Andrew Mitchell, 4 Glenpark Avenue, Prestwick.
Change for the better
I found David R Yule's comments on the arrest of Barbara Green (Letters, May 26) worrying and patronising.
Mr Yule stated that if people did not follow the "democratic way"
then it would lead "to anarchy, disruption, violence and disorder". However, history shows us that when a law is morally wrong, certain steps must be taken in order to change it.
If we followed Mr Yule's advice, we would still be in the situation where women could not vote, Britain would still be involved in the slave trade, the poorhouse would be overflowing and the window tax was due. Sometimes you just have to say no. Ask Rosa Parks.
J Anglim, Celts Street, Inverness.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article