Scientists have developed the first mathematical model to explain how things go viral online.
A team at Aberdeen University looked at comparisons between the transmission of social phenomena and infectious diseases to come up with the model, which includes the impact of friends and acquaintances in the sudden spread of new ideas.
The research uses maths to explain explosive contagion in social networks - such as posts going viral - and shows how people's reluctance to accept a new idea is overcome if its transmission is strong enough.
The study highlights how social media can make explosive contagion more visible, but scientists found the intrinsic value of the idea or product, and whether friends and acquaintances adopt it, remains the crucial factor in whether it goes viral.
Dr Francisco Perez-Reche, from Aberdeen University's School of Natural and Computing Sciences, led the study.
He said: "We often witness social phenomena that become accepted by many people overnight, especially now in the age of social media.
"This is especially relevant to social contexts in which individuals initially hesitate to join a collective movement, for example a strike, because they fear becoming part of a minority that could be punished. But it also applies to new ideas or products.
"Mathematical models proposed in the past typically neglected the synergistic effects of acquaintances and were unable to explain explosive contagion, but we show that these effects are ultimately responsible for whether something catches on quickly.
"In very basic terms, our model shows that people's opposition to accept a new idea acts as a barrier to large contagion, until the transmission of the phenomenon becomes strong enough to overcome that reluctance - at this point, explosive contagion happens."
He said the model, published in Nature Scientific Reports, could potentially be used to address social issues, or by companies to give their product the edge over rivals by engineering viral posts.
The study was carried out with teams from Cambridge University, Zaragoza University in Spain and the National University of Colombia.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here