Nick Clegg visited a Glasgow dogging site while he was Deputy Prime Minister.
The Lib Dem leader was in the city for his party’s annual conference in 2013.
While there aides decided he would announce a key environment policy at a local nature reserve.
But while scoping out the Cathkin Marsh site with local police they were alerted to another use for the beauty spot.
Staff immediately panicked and wondered whether to find an alternate venue.
But within hours they discovered news of the announcement had leaked and they would have to bring the planned press conference forward, leaving no time to find another place.
Ben Rathe, who used to work for Mr Clegg, confessed what had happened on his personal blog.
One policeman told him it was an “interesting place for a visit,” Mr Rathe wrote.
“I, thinking he meant they usually take politicians to schools, factories or nursing homes, launched into an explanation about why we’d chosen this location, the environmental impact discarded bags can have etc etc. I was swiftly cut off.
“’No, I mean because of what the locals use it for,’ he said.
“Now, 'what the locals use it for' is never a good sentence to hear, because usually 'the locals' are never using ‘it’ for anything good.
"I didn’t want to ask what he meant, mainly because I knew what he was going to say if I did, but felt that I had to. So I did.
“And then came the reply I had both expected and dreaded.
“’Oh, it’s a dogging site.’”
Just weeks earlier two pensioners had been spotted engaged in an “unsavoury act” in the bird hide at the spot on the outskirts of Glasgow.
A spokesman for the Lib Dems said: “As media coverage of the event shows it was the perfect spot, being a well-known nature reserve, to launch our policy."
He added: “Whatever people get up to in their own time, is up to them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel