NICOLA Sturgeon was yesterday challenged to abandon her government’s controversial research into fracking in Scotland and declare an outright ban.
Scottish Green co-convener Patrick Harvie threw down the gauntlet at his spring conference, saying Holyrood needed more Green MSPs to push the SNP “beyond its comfort zone”.
He said only the Greens had shown clear, consistent opposition to fracking, with Labour first backing local referendums on whether to drill, then a ban, and the LibDems supporting fracking when in power at Westminster, then U-turning this week to back a ban.
The SNP Government last year declared a moratorium on fracking, but recently ordered research on its environmental, health and economic aspects, as well as a study into how any future fracking operations could be decommissioned.
Addressing around 200 delegates in Edinburgh, Harvie said: “Greens are here to give absolute crystal clarity. It’s a clarity we’re not getting from the SNP. If Nicola Sturgeon is to be taken seriously when she said on Thursday ‘it ain’t going to happen’, then why on earth do we need to spend time and money researching the implications of going ahead with these technologies or how to clean up the mess afterwards?
“If the SNP are clear that fracking ain’t going to happen in Scotland, I challenge them now to cancel that programme of consultation and research, put the money into something worthwhile instead, and have an immediate, permanent, full ban on fracking and all unconventional gas.”
The Glasgow MSP added the other parties were also committed to extracting as much oil and gas from the North Sea as possible, despite the threat to climate change.
“We have no sympathy for those simply trying to outflank one another on fracking while continuing a relentless pursuit of other fossil fuels, which we know are unsafe,” he said.
Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is the process of releasing methane gas from deep underground by pumping water and chemicals at high pressure into shale beds.
Central Scotland has large areas of shale and Ineos, the petrochemical giant that runs the Grangemouth refinery, is keen to use the technology north of the border.
A recent Scottish Government-commissioned report said fracking could be done safely, but critics say it can cause pollution, contaminate groundwater, and adds to climate change.
Despite its own research backing the technology, the SNP has put off a decision on whether to allow it until after the election, while it gathers further evidence. This has fuelled claims that ministers, seeing a possible way to raise millions in tax, secretly plan to allow fracking once the moratorium ends.
The issue shot up the political agenda last week when Kezia Dugdale said Labour would ban fracking and challenged Sturgeon at First Minister’s Questions to make her position clear.
Sturgeon replied: “Let me put it simply: there will be no fracking in Scotland because there is a moratorium on fracking. That is what a moratorium means – it ain’t allowed to happen.”
However, she did not address what lay beyond the moratorium.
To widespread ridicule, the Scottish LibDem leadership announced yesterday their manifesto would also include a ban on fracking - just a week after LibDem members voted to allow it.
The Greens have registered the description “Ban Fracking Now” with the Electoral Commission, meaning the phrase can appear next to party’s name on ballot papers.
In digs at the SNP’s perceived lack of radicalism, the party has also registered Scotland Can Be Bolder and A Bolder Parliament, a Better Scotland.
The party is hoping to win its largest ever haul of candidates in May: one from each of the eight regional lists, and possibly two from Glasgow, Lothian and the Highlands & Islands.
Harvie said the SNP’s timidity in office, exemplified by ambiguity over fracking and “tweaking” the council tax, was helping to make the case for more Green MSPs and a bolder parliament.
He said: “It’s astonishing that the SNP seem determined to prove that our demand for a bolder Holyrood is an urgent one, but I thank them for making that case so clearly."
A number of list candidates attacked what they called the “SNP’s council tax”.
Andy Wightman said it was a discredited Tory relic, while Sarah Beattie-Smith was cheered for declaring: “The SNP’s council tax must go!”
Ross Greer said the Greens would push for a 50 per cent increase in carer’s allowance after the election and Kirsten Robb said they could create 204,000 green energy and technology jobs by 2035.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “Research has been commissioned on the environmental, climate change, public health and economic issues associated with unconventional oil and gas to fully inform public debate. No fracking can or will take place while the Scottish Government’s moratorium on unconventional oil and gas remains in place.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel