NICOLA Sturgeon will today announce new measures to ensure a greater number of poorer students in Scotland can go to university with plans for a Commissioner for Fair Access and the prospect of introducing conditions on higher education funding to “impose” wider student access in the future.
The Scottish Government has come under fire from its political opponents for the slow rate of progress in narrowing the university access gap between those students from richer backgrounds and those from poorer ones.
Although access for poorer students has improved in recent years, figures for 2013/14 nonetheless showed just 1335 school-leavers from the poorest 20 per cent of households went to university in Scotland compared to 5520 from the richest 20 per cent.
Last year, it emerged that only 9.7 per cent of Scots were accepted to university from disadvantaged areas compared to 17 per cent in England, 13.9 per cent in Northern Ireland and 15.5 per cent in Wales.
Indeed, at universities such as St Andrews, Aberdeen and Edinburgh less than than five per cent of their intake came from the poorest communities.
In 2014, the First Minister established the Commission on Widening Access and in March it produced its final report, setting out 34 recommendations aimed at getting students from more deprived backgrounds into higher education.
Among its more eye-catching recommendations was that, from 2019, students from poorer backgrounds should be accepted into Scottish universities with lower grades than their middle class counterparts. One target set and accepted by the SNP Government was that, by 2030, students from the poorest 20 per cent of postcodes made up 20 per cent of all university entrants in Scotland ie a doubling of the current number within 15 years.
Another commission proposal was for the setting up of a Commissioner for Fair Access, which the Scottish Government has today also accepted.
The Commissioner's role would be to "lead cohesive and systemwide efforts to drive fair access in Scotland", including commissioning research and producing an annual report to ministers.
A senior Holyrood source explained: “To keep the pressure up on the universities, the Commissioner will report annually and be able to recommend to the Scottish Government that, if progress isn't being made, we could impose wider access on individual universities via the funding system.” The ministerial power to do this lies in the Post-16 Education (Scotland) Act.
“Imposing widening access could include using Scottish Funding Council funding, as suggested in the Widening Access Commission’s report, specifically to fund wider access at a university either via specific places or financial restrictions,” the source explained.
The FM has already announced that the SNP administration will work with universities to ensure that people with care experience, who meet the minimum entry requirements, will be guaranteed a place at university and also receive a full bursary.
The SNP manifesto will commit to taking forward the recommendations of the Commission in areas that are the responsibility of the Scottish Government and will support the adoption of all its recommendations across the sector.
Speaking ahead of a National Union of Students hustings, Ms Sturgeon said: “Access to university has been improving but we all know there is more we can do.
“The Commission on Widening Access has set out challenging targets that an SNP government will act on. I want to see universities, colleges and the entire education system embrace these recommendations and take steps to improve access to university.
“To ensure there is no complacency and that we keep the pressure on for real change, we will appoint a Commissioner for Fair Access.”
The FM said the Commissioner would be a real advocate for change across the whole of the sector but must also be able to “demand action”.
She added: “If the Commissioner finds universities that are not delivering on their commitments, then they should be able to recommend that the Scottish Government use the powers we have to impose widening access on universities.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel