IT is a debate which has set the world's giant chemical companies against environmentalists and scientists the world over. But now a major new review of evidence has found that toxic pesticides ARE responsible for the wholesale deaths of bees across the globe.
Scientists say that toxic pesticides in widespread use by farmers around the world are responsible for destroying neurons in the brains of bees and causing “slow death by poison”.
Scientists say that toxic pesticides in widespread use by farmers around the world are responsible for destroying neurons in the brains of bees and causing “slow death by poison”.
Nicotine-based chemicals used to protect crops from insects could also be harming butterflies, hoverflies and other insects essential for pollinating flowers, scientists say - and could threaten world food production.
The warning has prompted renewed calls by wildlife campaigners for the Scottish Government to impose a permanent ban on some pesticides. The pesticide industry, however, has insisted a ban would do “very little” to help bees, and has dismissed the claims.
Scientists from the University of Sydney in Australia and the French National Institute for Agricultural Research have investigated the dangers of neonicotinoid pesticides. They make up a quarter of the global insecticide market, and are used on potatoes, wheat, barley and oats in Scotland.
In an expert review, Francisco Sánchez-Bayo and Nicolas Desneux point out that central European countries lost 25 per cent of their honeybee colonies between 1985 and 2005. In North America 59 per cent of colonies have gone over 60 years.
Neonicotinoids are amongst the most toxic pesticides on the market for bees, they argue. They bind to receptors in bee brain neurons, kill off the neurons and eventually kill the bees.
“It is literally a slow death by small but constant inputs of poison,” they say. The pesticides also weaken bees’ immune systems “leaving them defenseless against virus proliferation”, they argue.
“These systemic insecticides are the ultimate cause of this complex crisis of honey bee health...The impact that [they] are having on the ecosystems built upon [many other insects] may thus compromise the sustainability of our agricultural production.”
According to Dr Penelope Whitehorn, a bee researcher at the University of Stirling, said: “Studies have shown that the chemicals cause immune suppression in honeybees, a decreased ability to navigate and forage successfully in both honeybees and bumblebees and, crucially, a loss of reproductive success in bumblebees.”
The Scottish Wildlife Trust has been campaigning for years to get three neonicotinoids permanently banned in Scotland. The European Union has limited their application, but this has not stopped them from being used on several crops.
The trust’s head of policy, Dr Maggie Keegan, said: “The Scottish Government has told us that there is not enough evidence to know if the effects of neonicotinoids are strong enough to affect honeybee colony health, but the conclusions of this new report should make them think again about imposing a permanent ban.”
Matt Shardlow, chief executive of the insect conservation group, Buglife, said: “There is good evidence that neonicotinoid and other pesticides severely damage the immune systems of honeybees..
“Most pollination is done by wild bees, moths and hoverflies that are also vulnerable to pesticides and disease. For the sake of the health of the countryside we would like to see a complete ban in Scotland.”
The Crop Protection Association, which represents pesticide manufacturers, argued that pesticides were just one of many factors that put pressure on pollinators. “For managed honeybees disease is by far the most significant problem,” said the association’s chief executive, Nick von Westenholz.
“Modern agriculture relies on crop protection products, such as insecticides, to maintain a safe and affordable supply of food. It also recognises that they are, by design, intended to control pests such as insects.”
He added: “Restricting the use of neonicotinoids without addressing the other factors affecting bee health will not only damage the ability of farmers to produce a healthy, sustainable crop, but will do very little to improve the viability of bee populations.”
Julian Little, a spokesman for Bayer, which makes neonicotinoids, dismissed the new review. “Blaming the nearest chemical might seem appropriate but it is often a big distraction from the real issue, in this case the lack of options for beekeepers to control the ever present danger of the Varroa mite,” he said.
The Scottish Government declined to comment on future plans because of the election.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here