It is the party that - arguably - has done more than any other to back Scotland's indigenous languages.
A Labour Government in Westminster, after all, was the first to formally recognised both Scots and Gaelic. And Labour steered through current Gaelic laws.
So there were a bit of surprise in linguistic circles when the party in its latest Holyrood manifesto discovered a third Scottish minority language in its manifesto: Nordic.
READ MORE: Kezia Dugdale targets undecided voters with 'honest plan' to tax better off
"We recognise Scotland's rich cultural heritage, including Gaelic, Scots and Nordic," the party said, before adding: "We will meet the current commitment to Gaelic education to all students that require it."
This caught the eyes of language policy wonks. Why? Well, there is no such language as Nordic. There isn't even a Nordic language group. Voters in Orkney, Shetland and other parties of Scotland may well have ancestors who spoke Norn, a western Scandinavian tongue similar to modern Faroese. Norn, however, is long dead, although its legacy still heard in some of the broader Scots spoken in the Northern Isles.
Did Labour mean they want to protect Scandinavian cultural influences in Scotland? (The Nordic world is usually considered to be made up of the Scandinavians of Denmark, Sweden and Norway, as well as Icelanders and, lastly Finns, who have no language connection to the others). And if they wanted to protect something called Nordic culture, whatever that is, did they no also want to do the same for Irish, or Welsh, or Norman or Anglo-Saxon?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel