Ken Livingstone has been suspended by Labour for "bringing the party into disrepute" following an anti-Semitism row.
The party is launching an investigation into the former London mayor's conduct after outraged senior Labour figures lined up to call for him to be kicked out.
Chief whip Rosie Winterton is also hauling backbencher John Mann in for a meeting over his behaviour after he launched a furious face-to-face attack on Mr Livingstone, accusing him of being a "Nazi apologist".
Read more: Ken Livingstone called 'Nazi apologist' in confrontation with Labour MP
A Labour spokesman said: "Ken Livingstone has been suspended by the Labour Party, pending an investigation, for bringing the party into disrepute.
"The chief whip has summoned John Mann MP to discuss his conduct."
Read more: Labour faces anti-semitism storm as MP Naz Shah suspended
Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale was among those who had called for the party to act after the former London mayor invoked Adolf Hitler to defend a Labour MP accused of anti-Semitism.
Mr Livingstone said that Naz Shah’s comments "were over the top but she’s not anti-Semitic".
He added: "Let’s remember when Hitler won his election in 1932, his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel. He was supporting Zionism – this before he went mad and ended up killing six million Jews. The simple fact in all of this is that Naz made these comments at a time when there was another brutal Israeli attack on the Palestinians."
On the way into an interview for the BBC’s Daily Politics programme Mr Mann shouted at Mr Livingstone that he was a “Nazi apologist”.
Mr Livingstone accused him of being “over the top”.
Less than two hours later Labour announced in a statement that Mr Livingstone had been suspended, "pending an investigation, for bringing the Party into disrepute".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel