CROFTERS have accused the organisation which oversees the system of "overbearing behaviour" and called for an inquiry to be launched into the body.
The row developed after 13 crofters were controversially removed from their positions on two voluntary groups set up under the Crofting Commission to manage common grazings.
One of the grazings committees, in Mangersta on the Outer Hebrides, has now accused the commission of "appalling" behaviour while a legal expert said there was a "worrying trend concerning alleged abuse of power" within the organisation.
Solicitor Brian Inkster, an authority on crofting law, said it was not the first time he had heard actions taken by the Crofting Commission referred to as being “dictatorial, vindictive and unjustified”.
Grazing committees are set up under the commission to manage the common grazings, the areas of land shared by local crofters traditionally for their sheep or cattle. Committee members are elected by the other crofters, and are not paid.
However, all eight crofters on Upper Coll grazings committee on the island of Lewis have been removed. It is claimed it follows several of them lodging complaints against Colin Kennedy, the convenor of the Crofting Commission.
A second Lewis grazings committee, Mangersta on the west side of the island, has now revealed that its five members were also dismissed by the commission before Christmas. They say it is because they failed to make payments to a long-term absentee tenant.
Members of the Upper Coll committee had accused Mr Kennedy, a crofter from the island of Coll, of unfair and biased conduct when he chaired a meeting in the district held to hear issues raised by two other local crofters against the committee.
It was found that the Upper Coll committee had not distributed income relating to croft house sites to individual crofters, as required by the terms of the crofting legislation, and instead banked the money in the township fund.
The committee was then given several months to get its accounts audited. Local accountants were hired, but what was produced was still found wanting by the commission, which subsequently removed all the members from the committee.
The dispute in Mangersta, a community of 13 crofts, is also over the distribution of money.
In a statement the Mangersta committee accused the commission of “overbearing and inconsistent behaviour” and warned that “if the right of individual tenants to receive personal shares of public money intended for village improvements and participation in agri-environmental schemes is upheld, the entire system of crofting agriculture will face collapse".
It added: “We have observed with great interest events in Upper Coll and see significant parallels with our own experience. The role of the Crofting Commission has been appalling and the sooner there is an inquiry into its entire operations, the better.”
Mr Inkster said: "This highlights a worrying trend concerning alleged abuse of power within the Crofting Commission."
Rhoda Grant, Labour’s Holyrood candidate in the Western Isles, has written to the commission’s chief executive, Catriona MacLean, saying the body has gained an "unwelcome reputation for its high-handed, overbearing attitude towards good people doing their best to hold crofting together".
But the Crofters Commission said that action in Upper Coll followed an approach from a number of local shareholders to investigate the way the committee was conducting its business.
A spokeswoman said. “The commission will investigate when requests of this nature are brought to us by shareholders.”
She said that as the case was live she could not comment further, but the commission would be contacting shareholders.
The Crofting Commission took over from the old Crofters Commission in April 2012, with six of its nine commissioners directly elected for the first time.
One of the organisation's main aims is to tackle absenteeism and promote croft occupancy. It requires crofters to live within 20 miles of crofts or be deemed absentees.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel