Enter Helen: The Invention of Helen Gurley Brown and the Rise of the Modern Single Woman
Brooke Hauser
Harper, £16.99
Review by Rebecca McQuillan
In spring 1965, a reed-thin 43-year-old in designer clothes walked into the New York office of a struggling magazine to take over its editorship. She had never edited anything before and had landed the job through persuasion and celebrity after publishing a controversial bestselling book, Sex and the Single Girl.
Within six months, she had boosted sales to over a million. She did this by aiming it unapologetically at young single women. She put semi-nude girls on the cover, banned long words, was relentlessly upbeat and above all, talked about sex, sex, sex. Her name was Helen Gurley Brown and the magazine was Cosmopolitan.
Enter Helen attempts to tell the story of the real Brown and her rise from secretary to champion of the single gal, drawing on Brown’s own writings and interviews with those who knew her. The woman who emerges is focused and oh-so-bold in challenging prejudices about single women, but also at times mercenary and manipulative; shrewd while also seeming in some ways wildly lacking in insight. She was a brilliant self-promoter. Softly spoken, flirtatious, and given to shameless flattery, she nevertheless had a steely core. Her staff called her The Iron Butterfly.
Helen Gurley was from a modest background and became a secretary in an advertising agency in the 1950s, but then moved up to be a copywriter.
In this respect, she was a pioneer, like Peggy Olson in Mad Men, but Peggy would have been dismayed by Brown’s willingness to sleep with men to get ahead. The venality of becoming a rich businessman’s mistress to milk him for money did not seem to faze Brown. She approached her men like a spy approaches his target: with patience and a cool head. That was how she landed her wealthy well-connected husband, movie producer David Brown, though theirs proved to be a marriage of equals.
Was Helen Gurley Brown truly a feminist? Much later she did define herself as such, but to modern sensibilities, her liberated attitude to sex seemed to meld with the instincts of a Surrendered Wife.
On the one hand, her 1962 book Sex and the Single Girl was a landmark publication that argued a woman had just as much right to a sex life outside marriage as a man. It celebrated a girl’s choice to live alone and included chapters on careers and saving money. Yet at the same time, the woman she described was obsessed with being pleasing to men. It gave advice on where to find men, having affairs with married men, informed women that it was the man’s role to pay for most things, and urged them to consider voice training if their feminine vocals were insufficiently sexy.
The irony about Sex and the Single Girl was that Brown wrote it once married; indeed, the whole project had been her husband’s idea.
As Cosmo’s editor, she related to women with hang-ups, but fuelled those insecurities with articles obsessing about hair, make-up and cosmetic procedures.
In the late 1960s, she published a painfully misjudged article extolling the glamorous side of Saigon, no less – “COULD YOU WORK IN VIETNAM?”– the idea being, of course, that there was no better place to meet men. Other articles included “Why I wear my false eyelashes to bed” and “How not to be dumped on his way up”.
But it is only fair to see Brown in the context of her time. She had been a single woman in the oppressively chauvinist 1940s and 50s, when many a clever woman advanced by manipulating men; by the late 60s, feminists were trying to free women from being defined by sex. The feminist Betty Friedan was one withering critic. Gloria Steinem defended Cosmo for proclaiming women’s right to a sex life, but her relationship with the older Brown was like that of an exasperated parent with a wayward child who lacks self-awareness.
And yet in some respects Brown shared the goals of Women’s Liberation, such as advancing abortion rights. In 1970 she wrote an editor’s letter endorsing the feminist movement.
A direct line can be traced from Helen Gurley Brown to Bridget Jones and Sex and the City: generations of women obsessed with being sexy and plagued with insecurities. Indeed, the parallel with the fictional Jones is striking: Brown regularly took her measurements and listed what she ate. Her 1973 New Year’s resolution was “Relax chin, stay at 105lbs…”
She is therefore an uncomfortable icon for the modern feminist, but as this illuminating book makes clear, the western world would perhaps look rather different for women had she never put pen to paper.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here