Dawson International's chairman Mike Hartley saw his remuneration tumble from £505,000 to £265,000 last year as the firm slid into the red.
However, Dawson is asking shareholders to approve a 12-month extension to the expiry date of four million of his six million share options, which were due to lapse this year.
The cashmere group, which posted results for 2006 on Monday and published its annual report yesterday, paid Hartley and finance director David Cooper a total of £397,000, against £700,000 in 2005 when Dawson broke through into profit.
Hartley received only his basic £265,000 fee, while Cooper earned £14,000 in bonus to add to his £118,000 salary. He also saw a £256,000 increase in the transfer value of his accrued pension to £745,000.
Hartley has no pension with the company but does have options over six million shares, at exercise prices of 5p upwards, all of which are currently "under water".
The shares closed yesterday at 4.25p, and three million of the options expire this month, with another one million lapsing at the end of the year.
The report says shareholders will be asked later this month to approve a 12-month extension to the expiry date of all four million options.
Cooper and new US-based chief executive Andy Bartmess share 3.5 million long-term options exercisable over three years from next May at prices of 7.625p and 10.5p.
Hartley's stake fell from 797,200 shares after a sale of 375,000 shares last year at prices above 10p, weeks before a profit warning. He apologised at the annual meeting and said the timing of a tax-driven sale was unfortunate and coincidental.
The remuneration committee is made up of three independent non-executives, though until February 2006 it comprised Hartley, Cooper and former director Gianni Ghione, who was paid £147,000 in 2005 but only £35,000 last year. He resigned last June.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article