The Government has failed to answer major questions about the replacement of the Trident nuclear deterrent and there has been a "disturbing silence" about the UK's commitment to multilateral disarmament, Emily Thornberry has said.
The shadow defence secretary, who is leading a review of Labour's policy on the issue, questioned the cost and effectiveness of the planned replacement for the submarines carrying the Trident missiles and said people on "the other side" of the debate had to make the case for renewal.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn backs unilateral disarmament and Ms Thornberry has said she is sceptical about Trident, but many of the party's MPs and the trade unions support the renewal programme.
Read more: Anger as £642m Trident nuclear submarines investment is confirmed
In a speech to defence think tank the Royal United Services Institute, Ms Thornberry posed a series of questions for "the Government and those on the other side of this debate" to answer.
She said: "What is the current operational requirement? What uses will it have, and what challenges might it face, in the future operational environment? What is the total cost of bringing it into operation? Are there more cost-effective alternatives?
"And, always most important, do the benefits outweigh the costs?
"To my mind, none of these questions have been fully answered. And if not, how can we determine whether the case has been made?"
She said the costs of manufacturing the boats to replace the ageing Vanguard fleet had been put at £41 billion but there was "only silence" on the expense of the warheads, maintenance and infrastructure.
Ms Thornberry also claimed ministers had "deserted" their duty to the cause of multilateral disarmament.
Read more: Trade union's call to 'back the bomb' puts Labour splits on Trident at heart of election
In a speech highlighting commitments to multilateral disarmament from key figures in Labour history including Harold Wilson and Aneurin Bevan, she said: "While there are many other equally difficult problems also now facing mankind, like climate change, terrorism, global poverty and the state of the world economy, huge attention is being paid to each of those while almost none is being paid to the issue of disarmament."
Read more: Nicola Sturgeon condemns Trident and House of Lords as 'twin relics'
She argued that as an original signatory to the non-proliferation treaty, the UK had a "particular obligation" to respect it and ensure that others do the same.
"But under this government, that duty has been deserted. That is why we hear the growing frustration of the majority of the world's countries with the inertia on nuclear disarmament from countries like our own."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here