Claims used to promote some supplements for preventing dementia or aiding brain health are not backed up by scientific evidence, according to a report.
A panel of experts tasked by the watchdog Which? to investigate the science behind a selection of supplements found "no robust evidence" linking ingredients such as Ginkgo Biloba, Vitamin B and D and fish oil to preventing or reducing the risk of dementia.
The panel also warned against using dementia tests after scrutinising a selection ranging from free apps to a £1,275 online test, saying they could lead to many people being unduly worried about the chances of them developing dementia by creating 'false positives'.
Research had shown that many people diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment do not go on to develop dementia at all.
The 'Dementia Test' app failed to ask basic questions such as a person's age and sex, which are the strongest risk factors for dementia and the 'Food for the Brain' app recommended additional tests and Vitamin B, despite those taking the test performing above or at the norm for their age.
The panel, including a GP, a dietitian and a professor of public health medicine, studied a selection of supplements sold on the high-street and online including Bioglan Calamari Gold capsules, Efamol Brain Active Memory capsules, Boots Sharp Mind tablets and BrainSmart Memory capsules.
One claimed the vitamins, minerals and herbal ingredients used could protect against vascular and brain cell damage including strokes, which can cause dementia, while others stated they could maintain brain function, mental performance and memory.
Which? believed that in two cases, the claims were not substantiated by the European Food Safety Authority and were potentially misleading.
Efamol told Which? that it did not intend to mislead consumers and had taken down its website temporarily while undertaking a rigorous review of its marketing and the claims made for its products.
Read more: Study finds curry each week can stave off dementia
BrainSmart said their product did not claim to prevent, cure or treat disease, and scientific data clearly supported its efficacy, adding that they comply with all applicable rules and regulations.
Which? director of policy and campaigns, Alex Neill, said: "People with dementia, or those with a friend or family member with the condition, will often be scared and worried about their diagnosis.
"It's unacceptable that these companies are preying on people's fears, making claims they simply can't stack up.
"For people worried about dementia our advice is you don't need to spend time and money on expensive supplements or products like online tests or apps.
"There are many alternative sources of free, independent information and advice that can help you to understand your options and next steps."
Which? noted advice that small lifestyle changes could make a difference to the risk of dementia, such as eating a healthy, balanced diet, regular exercise, avoiding high levels of alcohol and everyday activities such as reading and playing chess.
NHS England figures show that more than 750,000 people in the UK suffer from some form of dementia, most commonly Alzheimer's.
A Boots spokeswoman said: "Boots Sharp Mind tablets is a food supplement designed to help support a normal healthy lifestyle and this includes a well-balanced diet.
Read more: Researches and artists create toolkit to help people living with dementia
"The levels of vitamins and minerals present in the product have been reviewed and comply with the safe levels for supplements published by recognised experts. This reference can be found on the Food Standards Agency website and is referred to as 'Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals (2003) Safe Upper Levels for Vitamins and Minerals'.
"The supplement is not designed to treat or to prevent a diagnosed health condition."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel