A conservation body has unveiled a controversial vision for the better management of Scotland’s upland areas, to reverse decline in important habitats.
But it has been criticised by those working on sporting estates for advocating mandatory deer management, which would mean more being shot.
Almost half (44%) of Scotland’s land area is classed as upland, including peatland, heather moorland and native woods, some of which is under threat according to the Scottish Wildlife Trust (SWT).
The SWT says that between the 1940s and 2007, heather moorland was reduced by over 20%, due mainly to afforestation, conversion to rough grassland and an increase in the extent of bracken.
“This loss of moorland was driven largely by historic increases in sheep grazing levels” associated with subsidies from national and EU public funds.
But it was also affected by “an increase in wild deer numbers, poorly managed muirburn and increased drainage, all of which encouraged the growth of grasses over heather.”
The charity recommends ten key changes needed to better protect the uplands in the future.
These include reforming subsidy regimes for upland sheep and cattle farming to encourage low stocking densities and ‘agro-forestry’ systems; and encouraging the development of wildlife-rich ‘transition zones’ for which landowners would be financially rewarded.
It proposes licensing “driven upland grouse moor management in order to encourage more sustainable management practices.”
But it is the section on deer which is most controversial, with the recommendation to:
“Introduce mandatory management, monitoring and reporting of wild deer densities for landowners to ensure deer populations and densities are managed at truly sustainable levels.”
A spokesman for the Scottish Gamekeepers Association (SGA) said that while SWT was calling for regulation of deer management, it should look to how it manages deer on its own reserves.
He said a Freedom of Information in April had shown that Scottish Natural Natural Heritage (SNH) had not held deer cull information for the SWT reserve at Largiebaan on Kintyre for the last four years.
He continued “Loch Ardinning (near Milngavie) another SWT reserve, has shown no cull returns from 2012-2013 onwards."
Alan Anderson, SWT Head of Wildlife Reserves for Scottish Wildlife Trust said in response to SGA the trust had made some excellent progress bringing high deer numbers down on its 120 wildlife reserves in recent years.
He said he was puzzled why the FOI showed no cull return Largiebaan "so we will be looking into this."
Meanwhile Richard Cooke, Chairman, the Association of Deer Management Groups (ADMG), which represents estates and other landholdings, said:
“Yet again we have one of the environmental NGOs calling for more regulation for deer management in the knowledge that the recently passed Land Reform (Scotland) Act has given SNH additional powers to intervene. "
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here