PLANS for a windfarm at Scotland's largest nature reserve have been axed and a raft of others have been legally stalled in a victory for campaigners and conservationists.
The Court of Session has ruled in favour of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds in its challenge against the Scottish Government's decisions to permit four schemes in the Forth and Tay Firths.
READ MORE: Parents struggle to find summer childcare, report finds
Lord Stewart has ordered ministers to reconsider their consent after the RSPB argued consideration was not given to rare wildlife and that the Government had failed to properly consult interested parties regarding environmental concerns surrounding the project.
The Government had previously estimated the windfarms could generate up to £1.2billion for the national economy, create over 13,500 jobs and provide enough power for 1.4 million homes.
In a separate development, plans for turbines on the hills facing Wigtown Bay on the Galloway coast have been refused after a decision by Dumfries and Galloway Council was upheld by ministers.
The Government's Reporter, who adjudicates on contentious planning matters, refused an appeal by green energy firm Ecotricity "because of the significant adverse impacts the proposal would have on the regional scenic area and the landscape".
Objections by Historic Scotland to the scheme due to the proximity of Neolithic standing stones were also a factor in the seven turbine scheme being rejected.
Campaigners had claimed the turbines would "scar the Galloway Hills and views from the Machars Coast indefinitely", interfere with plans for further breeding eagles to be introduced in area already home to peregrine falcons, hen harriers, ospreys and red kites.
With Wigtown home to an increasingly popular literary festival and an inspiration for Robert Burns, J M Barrie and Gavin Maxwell, author of Ring of Bright Water, there were also claims the plans would "form a heinous backdrop to Scotland's National Book Town".
READ MORE: Glasgow to stage landmark show to celebrate Charles Rennie Mackintosh's 150th birthday
The Government Reporter, Trevor Croft, said: "I do not consider that the undoubted renewable energy benefits of the proposal are sufficient to outweigh the adverse impacts on landscape, visual receptors and the cultural heritage. I have considered all the other matters raised, but there are none which would lead me to alter my conclusions."
Martin Green, of the Save Wigtown Bay campaign, said the decision had helped safeguard tourist industry jobs.
He added: "Opposed by a small group of objectors, who mobilised over 1200 local people to object to the proposal, Ecotricity should now have learned that they cannot impose their will in Dumfries and Galloway, anymore than they can in the Cotswolds. This decision is a triumph for quietist objection and highly professional analysis by the local council officers."
Dale Vince. of Ecotricity, said: “In Paris last year, the world agreed to limit the Earth’s temperature increase to below two degrees, that means we have to stop burning fossil fuels by 2050. wind energy has a key role to play in this historic transition, we need to take opportunities like this one, to build more sources of green energy.”
Following Lord Stewart's ruling, the RSPB said it was "encouraged by the decisions of the court" and "took the last resort decision to challenge Scottish Ministers.. with great reluctance".
It added: "Unfortunately, consents were granted when thousands of gannets, puffins, kittiwakes and other seabirds from iconic internationally protected wildlife sites like the Bass Rock and the Isle of May were predicted to be killed every year.
"The Government’s statutory nature conservation advisors, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, had also raised significant concerns about the windfarms.
"In these circumstances, RSPB Scotland could not just stand by and let such devastating impacts on Scotland’s wildlife happen without making a stand. Regrettably, legal action was our only option."
READ MORE: Parents struggle to find summer childcare, report finds
Minister for business, innovation and energy Paul Wheelhouse said: "Clearly, protecting Scotland's marine environment is of paramount importance: it is at the heart of the Scottish government's approach to offshore renewable energy applications, and we are keen to work constructively with both the RSPB and renewable energy developers to ensure the sector has a bright future in Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel