HEALTH and social care services could suffer as highly-skilled EU staff shun Scotland because of Brexit, the health secretary will warn MSPs today.
Shona Robison will use a Holyrood debate to highlight the risk caused by uncertainty over citizenship status.
Approximately 1,400 doctors working in Scotland are from other EU countries, as well as 4 per cent of nurses and midwives and 2 per cent of trainee dentists.
Read more: UK facing £25bn "Brexit black hole" with austerity beyond 2020, think tank warns
Ms Robison said: “Medical professionals from all over the world have played a vital and valued part in our NHS for decades.
“The fact the UK Government can’t give simple assurances that they will be welcome to stay in this country if we leave the EU is, frankly, unacceptable.”
Ms Robison said Brexit could affect the recognition of other states’ medical qualifications, workers’ rights, research work, and Scots’ access to state healthcare across Europe.
Meanwhile, Nicola Sturgeon last night claimed the 52-48 vote for Brexit across the UK was not a “meaningful democratic mandate” to restrict EU migration in a hard Brexit.
Read more: UK facing £25bn "Brexit black hole" with austerity beyond 2020, think tank warns
Speaking in Sheffield, she said: “I completely accept there was a narrow majority in Wales and England for leaving the EU. However I don’t believe it can be concluded that there was a majority anywhere for leaving the single market.
“When the UK Government negotiates to leave the EU, single market membership should be sought as a priority. Some parts of that - such as retaining freedom of movement - will not satisfy everyone. However there is no ideal solution which does satisfy everyone.”
The argument is completely at odds with Theresa May, who said last month: “Let me be clear. We are not leaving the EU only to give up control of immigration again.”
Read more: UK facing £25bn "Brexit black hole" with austerity beyond 2020, think tank warns
Ms Sturgeon also urged Chancellor Philip Hammond to slow deficit reduction in his autumn statement, saying austerity had failed "categorically and comprehensively".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel