NICOLA Sturgeon has urged the whisky industry to abandon its legal action to block minimum unit pricing for alcohol in Scotland.
The Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) is due to decide on Friday whether to take its case to the UK Supreme Court after defeat in the Court of Session last month.
A Supreme Court hearing would tie up the case well into 2017.
The Scottish Parliament legislated in 2012 to link the price of alcohol sold in shops to its strength in order to tackle problem drinking, with cheap ciders and vodkas a particular target.
SNP ministers want a price of 50p per unit, making a bottle of whisky or vodka at least £14 and a bottle of wine about £4.50.
The SWA has led the fight against the change, arguing it breaches EU trade law.
At First Minister’s Questions, SNP MSP Kenneth Gibson said 69 per cent of spirits sold in Scotland cost less than 50p per unit, and a new minimum was “clearly the most effective and proportionate way to reduce the harm caused by cheap, high-strength alcohol.”
Ms Sturgeon said the main stumbling block was “whether the Scotch Whisky Association and its co-litigants in the case seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court”.
She added: “The SWA can, even at this late stage, choose not to apply for leave to appeal, and I very much hope that it chooses that course of action.
“I also hope that it and others reflect on the fact that minimum unit pricing was passed with the overwhelming support of the Parliament; that it has been tested in Europe; and that it has been approved twice now in the Scottish courts.
“I think the industry itself will receive widespread and very justified approval and respect if it accepts the time has now come to implement a measure that will save lives across Scotland.”
An SWA spokeswoman said: “We are still consulting on this. We will reach a decision by Friday’s deadline and make our decision public.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel