A PETITION used to back a controversial wind farm in the Highlands was hijacked by people who had no connection to the area.
The Scottish Government has been urged to reconsider its decision to approve the 22-turbine development as local support was one of the main arguments in favour of the project.
People from Doncaster, Dunfermline, Fife, and Fraserburgh, signed the petition calling for the Creag Riabhach development near Altnaharra, Sutherland, to be built on its estate.
The estate, owned by 82-year-old SNP supporter Jim Gray, who founded the Gray & Adams transport company in Fraserburgh, has branches in Dunfermline and Doncaster.
According to the petition, 166 supporters were registered at postcodes in Fraserburgh and nearby Peterhead – more than 160 miles away.
Only 49 people came from the local postcode – 11 are thought to live in Altnaharra. A total of 53 people from Doncaster and South Yorkshire signed up in favour of Creag Riabhach, along with 34 from Fife.
It was approved by Business and Energy Minister Paul Wheelhouse and is the first wind farm to gain approval in a designated wild land area.
Mr Wheelhouse justified his decision when he said it had “popular support from the local community council and public alike”.
Tim Philpot, a director of Creag Riabhach Wind Farm and an employee of Gray & Adams, said he could not explain the petition figures.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “The application for Creag Riabhach received strong local support.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article