IN May 2013 this columnist opined it was difficult to overstate the anger and sheer frustration felt in the islands, particularly across the Minch. This because the much-vaunted vision of creating an age of prosperity founded on wind, wave and tidal energy appeared to be disappearing over the horizon.
There was still no commitment to laying the subsea cable necessary to take the extra power generated by the green energy projects in the islands to the mainland to connect with the national grid. An important deadline for signing a contract for the work had been missed.
Three and a half years on, the anger and frustration have intensified. The Western Isles faces a 13.7% decrease in population by the year 2039, and desperately needs an economic catalyst.
But the UK Government's plans to curb subsidies for new onshore wind farms mean energy companies believe it's too expensive to start laying cables without the subsidies. But there is one glimmer of hope, a new consultation seeking views on whether island wind developments should be treated differently than those on the mainland.
There have been discussions about laying 'interconnectors' to the islands at least since the ultimately unsuccessful plans for the first giant wind farm for Lewis were unveiled in 2001. That's 15 years – the total time it took to build the Forth Rail Bridge (six years), the Channel Tunnel (six years) and the Skye Bridge (three years); or indeed to fight the Boer War, the two world wars and most of the Korean campaign.
But apparently we need even more discussion. What is there to discuss? If Scotland's islands's fortunes are to be transformed, they need the interconnectors, and not just for wind farms. As elsewhere there are many who oppose turbines on islands. But the subsea cables would be needed if/when offshore wind, wave or tidal energy projects come on stream.
Surely there has been enough talking. It is time to classify island projects as being 'offshore' and therefore not subject to the subsidy restriction.
On the subject of lengthy conversations, there should be these aplenty if the Scottish Government plans to create a super-quango board proceed unaltered.
This new Scotland-wide statutory board would replace existing individual agency boards and co-ordinate the activities of Scottish Enterprise, Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE), Scottish Development International, Skills Development Scotland and the Scottish Funding Council.
The last on that list alone allocates about £1.6 billion in public funds to Scotland’s 19 universities and 25 colleges each year. But this is to come under the same board, which presumably will be considering plans by HIE (budget £79.5m) such as refurbishing hotels in Sutherland, backing communities seeking to buy local land from Ardnamurchan to Ardgay or supporting a bagpipe-maker in Forres. The agenda/minutes documents could resemble the collected works of Tolstoy.
There are strong historical arguments for keeping local decision-making in the Highlands with a continuing HIE board. It hasn't been infallible, but what is proposed to take its place just seems plain daft.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel