ACTIVISTS have called for a controversial loophole in anti- fox hunting laws that allows hounds to flush wild animals out from underground burrows to be closed.
The use of hounds to coax foxes into the direct line of gunfire has been called a “decoy for traditional hunting practices” and must be outlawed, campaigners say.
Since Scotland became the first in the UK to ban traditional fox hunting and hare coursing in 2002, it has been illegal to hunt a wild mammal with a dog.
But hunts in Scotland can continue to kill foxes by practising an exemption to the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Act called “flushing to guns”, which means using dogs to chase foxes from beneath cover in order to shoot them.
A recent review of the law by Lord Bonomy, commissioned by the Scottish Government, called for landowners to be held legally responsible for hunts on their property, with hunt activities observed by independent monitors and governed by a new code of practice.
The report said there was lawbreaking under the ban, and further argued that current legislation “complicates unduly” the detection, investigation and prosecution of alleged offences.
Now Robbie Marsland, director of the League Against Cruel Sports Scotland, said: “The Government has a real chance to end fox hunting in Scotland – for good.
“Wild animals are no more protected from being hunted to the point of exhaustion and brutally killed by a pack of hounds than they were pre-2002. We agree with Lord Bonomy that the ‘flushing to guns’ exemption is used as a decoy for traditional hunting and, when used by mounted fox hunts, has little or nothing to do with pest control. Flushing to guns should be removed as an option for mounted hunts.”
Lord Bonomy said there were grounds for suspecting that illegal hunting may still take place, and that those suspicions should be addressed.
He suggested that hunt monitors could submit a report of their observations to Scottish ministers, with an annual summary included in the Wildlife Crime in Scotland Annual Report.
The Countryside Alliance, which represents hunts, said it was pleased the inquiry had “recognised the importance of gun packs for fox control and rejected unjustified calls for further restrictions”.
But it said it does not believe there is a significant problem with the enforcement of the current legislation.
Scottish Countryside Alliance Director Scotland James Stewart said: “Those using dogs to flush foxes and other wild mammals to guns under the law have always been open and transparent and therefore have nothing to fear.
“They have been subject to hundreds of hours of covert monitoring and filming, none of which has produced evidence of law breaking.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel