SCOTLAND has moved to end an outright ban on tail docking for dogs, allowing for vets to shorten the tails of specific breeds.
Vets will be allowed to dock the tails of spaniels and hunt point retrievers by up to one-third when they are puppies, after MSPs voted on the legislation.
Experts and animal rights campaigners have expressed outrage at the move, saying it represents a “retrograde step for animal welfare”.
For the past 10 years, there has been a ban on tail docking in Scotland after the Government introduced it as part of the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006. This also made it illegal to take a dog out of Scotland to have its tail removed.
While other parts of the UK have a ban on docking, there are exemptions for working dogs including spaniels, hunt point retrievers and terriers.
Previous moves to relax legislation in Scotland have been supported by gamekeepers for working dogs.
Holyrood’s Environment Committee passed the changes after hearing from Environment Secretary Roseanna Cunningham, who said evidence shows these types of gun dogs are at increased risk of injury without having their tails docked.
She said: “The regulations also ensure as far as is reasonably possible that only dogs likely to be used for lawful shooting purposes can have their tails shortened and that veterinarians are the only persons who may carry out the procedure."
The vet must also be satisfied there is sufficient evidence to show the animal will be used as a working dog in later life.
The move came after 92 per cent of those who took part in a Government consultation supported docking for these breeds.
Scottish Government Veterinary Adviser Andrew Voas told the committee he estimated 80 puppies would have their tails docked a year to avoid having to carry out one amputation on an older dog due to injury, which he said would cause more pain than the earlier procedure.
The amendment will now be taken to a full chamber vote in the Scottish Parliament.
The British Veterinary Association (BVA) expressed disappointment at the move, saying it “marks the start of a retrograde step for animal welfare in Scotland”.
Melissa Donald, BVA Scottish Branch President, said: “We are saddened that the committee voted in favour of reversing Scotland’s previously progressive stance on tail docking. Research commissioned by the Scottish Government suggests that up to 320 spaniel puppies would need to be docked to prevent one tail amputation. This prevalence of tail injury simply does not justify unnecessarily submitting puppies to this painful procedure.
Animal charity OneKind campaigner Sarah Moyes said the decision was “a huge step back in time, and goes against the opinion of veterinary organisations, animal welfare groups and the public”.
She added: “We understand that tail injuries to adult dogs is a serious welfare concern, but cutting off puppies’ tails cannot be justified.”
Dogs Trust, the UK’s largest dog welfare charity said it went against the will of the Scottish people citing a 2016 opinion poll which showed 71 per cent supported a full ban.
Dogs Trust’s deputy veterinary director, Runa Hanaghan, said: “Dogs Trust is deeply saddened that the Scottish Government is planning on re-introducing this outdated and unnecessary practice.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel