FORMER Labour First Minister Jack McConnell has joined the growing criticism of the Scottish Government’s decision to reinstate tail-docking for puppies.
Lord McConnell said many people would be “astonished” at the “backward step”.
He said: “When there are so many problems in Scottish education and other areas of Scottish Government policy, I cannot believe it has given priority to reintroducing cutting tails from young dogs.
“When we introduced the ban there was clear evidence to support it and that evidence still exists today. Many Scots will be astonished that the Scottish Government has chosen this backward step.”
Tail-docking was banned outright in Scotland when Lord McConnell was head of the Scottish Executive a decade ago through the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006.
However most SNP, Tory and LibDem MSPs voted to relax the ban for hunting dogs last week, meaning spaniels and hunt point retrievers under five days old can have a third of their tails amputated without anaesthetic to avoid more serious injuries in later life.
The British Veterinary Association said it was “appalled” by the decision, while the Dogs Trust called it a “significant step backward for animal welfare”.
However the Scottish Gamekeepers Association said it ended a decade of dogs have to endure painful injuries.
Environment Secretary Roseanna Cunningham said the procedure, involving skin, muscle, bone and nerve damage, was “briefly painful” but said vets would make the decisions in the interests of the animals, and it was “proportional” to the problem.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel