SHE'S the former receptionist who forced an MPs debate over her campaign to outlaw company bosses from forcing female employees to wear high heels at work.
Nicola Thorp, who went on to become TV soap Coronation Street's newest star set up a petition after she was sent home without pay from finance firm PwC two years ago after she refused to wear heels at work.
It was by more than 150,000 people, gained worldwide attention but ultimately, some feel, fell on deaf ears.
But the Government said laws in place were already "adequate" to deal with discrimination on gender grounds – a decision that Ms Thorp called "a cop-out"
The Government called, instead, on all employers with dress codes to review them and “consider whether they remain relevant and lawful”.
The Government Equalities Office also promised guidelines in the summer on dress codes to make the law clearer. A post-petition investigation by Commons committees found that women workers had been told to dye their hair, have manicures and wear revealing clothes by their bosses.
Last year 18-year-old waitress Erin Sandilands who was told to wear a skirt and make-up so she would be "easy on the eye" won her claim for sex discrimination.
The teenager was taken aside by a manager at Cecchini's bistro in Ardrossan, Ayrshire, and told to look more feminine "for the punters".
After she complained, the student - who was working under a zero-hours contract - was later told that her services were no longer needed, despite having previously been offered a full-time position.
After taking the business to an industrial tribunal, was awarded more than £3,500 for injury to her feelings and lost wages after employment judge Claire McManus found her evidence to be "entirely credible".
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel