The view of Dr Maxwell Barnish, of University of Aberdeen, lead author of the High Heels study
This review is the first to bring together both the health aspects and the psychological aspects of wearing high heels.
We examined both the positives and the negatives because it is too easy in these type of topics to concentrate on the negatives.
From the positive point of view, heels are rated as more attractive by men and other women, and also they influence men's behaviour to women's benefit. So, for example, there was a story where a woman had dropped her glove and the man was more willing to help her if she wore heels. That may be a bit old-fashioned and could be culturally bound.
Negative aspects are the increased risk of bunions, back pain, and injuries such as to ankles, and could lead to work absence.
If it is bad for your health we should not be requiring women to wear high heels. It should be a matter of choice.
Nicola Thorp launched a campaign after she was sent home when she refused to wear heels at work.
The government response was that they do not believe in old fashioned attitudes towards women, and they don't want women to have to wear them at work, but they felt that the Equality Act 2010 was doing the job. But this was the Act that was in place when the incident involving Ms Thorp occurred.
The Conservative party is the party of the employer, the party of the capitalist economy, so I suppose what they are trying to do is not to impose too much on employers.
Maybe they are focussing too much on the employers rights rather than the employees' rights. We need greater clarity of what the Equality Act says because different people are holding different views on it, the government issue statements but they are not the clearest statements in the world. And if they are not clear things just go to courts all the time.
There needs to be clear interpretation of what it means for the sake of businesses so that they understand it.
Devolved nations in the UK have devolved health powers, and if Wales and Scotland felt the Act was not doing enough, if they wanted to they could introduce specific legislation as a public health issue. Equality issues are not devolved but health is. My preference would be further legislation in line with what the Canadian province of British Columbia did [in scrapping the dress code which requires female employees to wear heels] to make it really clear.
But I don't know whether there is much political motivation for that at the moment. It will all come down to what the politicians feel is required or what is in their best interests.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here