A LOYALIST protester at the centre of a row over an alleged attack during a pro-independence rally is a former UKIP activist who caused a racism storm after he was photographed 'blacking up'.
Jack Neill, who stood for the party in Gordon Brown's old seat of Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath in the 2015 general election, was chased up George Square at the weekend before having his Union flag snatched which he had been flying from a mobile pole.
Police are investigating an alleged assault, which happened as Ollie Marshall, another former UKIP activist and Mr Neill claimed they were subjected to a volley of abuse objecting to their flying of the flag.
The incidents came as they stood near Queen Street station in a counter-demo on the fringes of the George Square Hope Over Fear event to commemorate the 2014 Scottish independence referendum.
Mr Neill has denied online accusations that he and his colleague were "looking for trouble" with the weekend's controversial counter-demo near Queen Street station, while it emerged he was at the centre of another row last year when pictures showed him with his face blacked up and wearing a clown nose and curly wig.
The University of the West of Scotland criminal justice student explained the personal snaps, some of which were posted on his Facebook page, were "a joke" and "purely for entertainment purposes for my friends" and said it was a skincare face mask. He said he regretted publishing the pictures which were condemned by race equality campaigners.
Mr Neill who denied allegations of racism, was given a key role when former UKIP leader Nigel Farage and the party's ex-Scottish leader David Coburn launched the party's Holyrood manifesto at an Edinburgh hotel in April, 2016.
He said of his protest: "I maintain that I did not go there to look for trouble or incite violence, as is being suggested."
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article