A bacterium best known for closing hospitals and schools is being hailed as a potential ally in the fight against climate change, after successful experiments at the University of Dundee.
Despite its sinister reputation for causing disease and food poisoning, e-coli is already widely used in biotech and microbiology.
Now scientists at Dundee’s Institute for Life Sciences have discovered that it can be used to capture carbon dioxide – with immediate potential for reducing the carbon impact of many industries, and a longer term hope that it could be put to work in reducing damaging CO2 emissions from heavier industries such as steel production.
READ MORE:
In a paper outlining the discovery, researchers describe e-coli as an “industrial workhorse organism” which could revolutionise carbon capture.
Lead researcher Professor Frank Sargant, and colleagues at Dundee have found a way to exploit the ability of e-coli to convert carbon dioxide in the presence of hydrogen, capturing the carbon in the form of formic acid.
The acid byproduct itself has a number of industrial uses – and is widely used as a de-icer at airports and airfields, in rubber manufacture as well as in fuel cells, although this results in the re-creation of carbon dioxide.
The technique has the potential to form a biological alternative to costly and controversial proposals such as ‘burying’ carbon dioxide underground or in the oceans, researchers claim.
Ultimately, microbial “cell factories” could be used to clean up the output of industrial processes which create the carbon dioxide which can contribute to global warming.
Professor Sargant said that the research was yet to be commercialised – although his team has been working with local industry partners Sasol UK and Ingenza Ltd. He admitted it had huge potential, although he said he was not motivated by financial gain.
“There are lots of different solutions being proposed for carbon capture, but this is right up there with them as something that is actually quite practical,” he said. “It is going in the right direction. Carbon capture is a controversial area, and engineers have come up with plans to bury CO2 underground. The idea has support but also has a lot of people worried. This could be a significant alternative.”
The method could already be used in a number of bio-based industries, Mr Sargant suggests, such as brewing or the artificial manufacture of insulin, which produce CO2 as a byproduct.
E-coli has been well researched for decades and scientists know how to handle it, Mr Sargant says. “It would be relatively straightforward to bolt on this system and capture the carbon as it is being produced.”
For more heavy industrial processes, which also produce carbon monoxide, there is a problem because the second gas can kill the bacterium before it can do its work. But the team believe this can be overcome, as can doubts over the use of hydrogen, which itself is created using a process which creates carbon dioxide.
Mr Sargant believes the bug could in that way help tackle one of humanity’s greatest challenges. “The whole field needs scientists to keep coming back with new ideas and testing the water,” he said. “We’ve got the technology. Maybe we should be using it.”
Dr Geoff Wood, Fellow in International Energy Law and Policy at Stirling Law School, said the research was a "possibly exciting development" for smaller-scale applications, but he had doubts about its prospects for larger scale CO2 removal. He said there were questions about the amount of the energy needed for the process and added: "Even if possible, the UK produces over 400 million tonnes of CO2 annually."
Previous optimism about carbon capture techniques has turned out to be misplaced, he said. "Regarding Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), economic questions have seen countries like the UK and Norway shelving projects and plans."
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel