IRN BRU fans have described the new reduced-sugar version as both "horrible" and "not bad" as they sampled the drink for the first time.
Scotland's so-called other national drink is being produced with less than 50 per cent of its regular sugar content from this month.
The new recipe has cut the sugar content per can from 8.5 teaspoons to four, reducing calorie content from just under 140 to around 65 calories.
Irn Bru makers AG Barr have been grappling with a shift in consumer tastes towards low-sugar drinks and have been preparing for the implementation of a sugar tax in 2018.
The Government levy, due to be introduced in April, is aimed at tackling soaring obesity rates.
Fans are reportedly stockpiling the drink to prepare for the change and a petition has been launched to save the traditional recipe.
AG Barr said the new version contains the same "secret Irn-Bru flavour essence", but with less sugar.
Opinions were divided among people who tried the new drink in a "taste test" in Glasgow on Friday.
Charelle Sadler, from Glasgow, who normally drinks regular Irn Bru, said: "It's horrible, it's just like drinking diet juice. It's not even got the same taste. "
Daniel Groundland, from Glasgow, said; "It's sweeter, the new one, but the original one has a slight different kick to it. It's not bad."
Other tasters found the new and old versions of the drink very similar.
Jackie Waddell, from Shotts, North Lanarkshire, said: "I don't taste any difference, I think they taste exactly the same."
Jacky Doyle, from Greenock, Inverclyde, agreed, saying: "I think they taste the same, I don't see much difference" while Jordan Lamb from Cardenden, Fife, said they tasted "really similar".
AG Barr has now stopped production of the higher sugar version and urged customers to try the new recipe when it reaches the shops.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel