A SENIOR figure in the SNP has questioned Scottish Government analysis which found a so-called 'no deal' Brexit would cost Scotland £12.7 billion a year by 2030, describing such forecasts as "very, very dubious".
Former Scottish Government minister Alex Neil, who voted leave in the EU referendum, said there are "so many unknowns" surrounding the figures in the economic forecast paper, launched by Nicola Sturgeon on Monday.
The paper models three possible Brexit scenarios which the First Minister said were the "only realistic outcomes of Brexit" - staying in the single market and customs union, a preferential trade agreement or reverting to World Trade Organisation terms in a no-deal Brexit.
Researchers analysed the impact on GDP, trade and immigration and found the latter deal could cost everyone in Scotland £2,300 by 2030, a £12.7 billion loss to the economy, while staying in the single market would cost around £4 billion or £700 per head.
The First Minister said if the UK does leave the European Union then remaining in the European single market and the customs union is the "only option that makes sense".
Mr Neil told the Daily Telegraph that a senior economist had informed him that in terms of long-range economic forecasts it would be hard to accurately predict "what will happen in the next three months".
The former health minister said: "That sums it up. I'm not saying we should not do these projections but you get out of the model what assumptions you put into it.
"I think until we see the shape of the deal, we don't know what the assumptions are.
"The point is you can never treat economic forecasts as a label for the truth because the reality is forecasts are very, very dubious, particularly when there are so many unknowns."
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel