WE are the nation which has more words for rain than the Eskimos have for snow.
From a yillen to a lashin, from a murr to a haar, Scots know how to describe every possible way to get drookit.
Now, at long last, the Met Office has decided to tell us just how wet we will be in wur ain leid.
Britain’s forecaster has formally announced that it will use what it rather controversially calls “regional slang” in its broadcasts.
It says even people using standard English across the UK have a huge variety of terms for the weather they are experiencing. Crucially, the experts at the Met Office think these words could be more accurate than scientific terms they prefer as they perform in front of their isobars.
Derrick Ryall, Head of Public Weather Service at the Met Office, explained “The range of slang for rain alone demonstrates the breadth and diversity of the English language and the varying terminology used across different parts of the UK.
“As the UK’s National Weather Service, we’re always looking to improve the way weather forecasts are communicated, to make them as useful as possible and increase their understanding. We’re asking the public to help us better understand how they talk about the weather by describing it in just 3 words on Twitter, giving us their location and using the hashtag #3wordweather starting on February 1.
“Ultimately we hope to use the insights from our research to tap into local dialects and vocabulary to make it easier for people across the UK to understand the forecast and make informed decisions based on it.”
The Met Office – though perhaps better at meteorology than phonology – has carried out a survey of the ways British viewers refer to heavy rain. It found the term ‘pouring’ was the most widely used word to describe heavy rain across the UK.
However, the cities of Cardiff, Brighton and Liverpool were found to favour ‘pissing it. Mancunians, meanwhile, were revealed as the most likely to say that rain was ‘lashing it down’, with half (57%) of people surveyed in the Black Country preferring to say ‘bucketing’.
The people of Newcastle and Leeds apparently like the term ‘chucking it down’, with 6 in 10 people from Newcastle and Leeds describing torrential rain this way. Although many might assume that those in Cambridge and Oxford would avoid the use of slang, each similarly favoured the term ‘chucking it’ to describe heavy rain (83 per cent and 57 per cent).
Glaswegians are most likely to use the term ‘pelting it’ and Londoners prefer to say ‘caning it’. Despite being almost 90 miles apart, the people of Birmingham and Bristol share the use of ‘tipping it down’, with 44 per cent and 41 per cent. saying this respectively.
A fifth of people in Southampton claim to break into song when it rains heavily, performing renditions of ‘it’s raining, pouring, the old man is snoring’.
Back in 2015 academics at the University of Glasgow discovered a huge variety of Scots language words for both rain and snow. They found that the Scots language had 421 ones for snow, or sna, eight times more than the inuit or eskimos. The findings suggested our non-standardised language was almost as diverse and difficult as our weather.
Speaking three years ago, Dr Susan Rennie, lecturer in English and Scots language at Glasgow University, said: ‘Weather has been a vital part of people’s lives in Scotland for centuries.
‘The number and variety of words in the language show how important it was for our ancestors to communicate about the weather, which could so easily affect their livelihoods.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel