The corrupt circle of an ousted Ukrainian president profited from last year's Eurovision thanks to a British shell firm.
A major BBC investigation has found the Kiev venue used to host the show's after-party was owned by an entirely opaque firm registered in England's Home Counties.
Their probe comes amid a growing chorus of concern about the abuse Scottish and English shell firms, not least as a way for criminals and corrupt officials from the former Soviet Union to make or hide dirty money.
The Eurovision firm shares an address in Potters Bar, just outside London's M25 ring road, with more than 100 other firms used to launder at least £1.2 billion.
That figure was calculated by Herald contributor Richard Smith using raw data from Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project.
BBC Radio Four's File on Four programme, broadcast on Tuesday, discovered that one firm at the address owned the Parkovy conference centre in central Kiev. It said the ultimate owner of that firm was somebody in the circle of Viktor Yanukovych. That means his cohorts - believed to have stolen nearly £30 billion from Ukraine - are still profiting four years after his ouster.
Transparency International, the anti-corruption group, has been urging reforms of Britain's corporate regime to stop shell firm abuse.
Its Rachel Davies Teka said: “UK companies are being created purely as get-away vehicles for corrupt individuals stealing money from some of the poorest populations in the world.
"We have to ask who is setting up these companies and why the system allows many of them to do so with little to no oversight.”
“Let’s be clear, some of the biggest cases of corruption around the world are made possible with the complicity of British based companies and the professionals that help form them.
"This is a national disgrace and whilst efforts have been made to end this problem, a lack of proper oversight and resourcing means we are still some way from ending our complicity in global corruption."
The UK Government signalled to The Herald this week that it would announce reforms "soon". We have previously revealed the mass avoidance of transparency rules introduced for Scottish limited partnerships last year. That was an extension of a regime introduced for other companies in 2016 under which most corporate entities ave to name a "person of significant control" or PSC, if they have one.
File on Four revealed new research from another anti-corruption group, Global Witness, in to compliance with the PSC regime. They found that nearly one in 10 UK companies - 350,000 - still had not named one.
There can be reasons not to file. But Murray Worthy, senior campaigner at Global Witness, said the number was "worryingly large".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here