KEZIA Dugdale's launch of a campaign in support of single market membership on the eve of Scottish Labour's conference will do precious little for party unity.
Dugdale's party critics believe the intervention is motivated by a desire to undermine her successor Richard Leonard.
However, regardless of her intentions, Dugdale's campaign message does have genuine merit. Although, it would be churlish not to give Jeremy Corbyn some credit for his recent policy shift, giving backing for the UK being in a permanent customs union with the EU after Brexit, Dugdale is correct to point out that single market membership represents the best chance of protecting jobs, mitigating austerity and defending workers’ rights.
Dugdale's successor Leonard, while mirroring Corbyn's position, has said he is happy for the option advocated by Dugdale to be voted on at Scottish Labour's conference this week.
For this, he deserves credit in contrast to some of his predecessors who were all too happy to seek to marginalise opposing voices in the party, most notably over opposition to the Iraq war at the 2003 Scottish Labour conference.
It may well be that Dugdale's position on Brexit is merely an opportunity for her and her allies to cause the maximum amount of political mayhem for Leonard. However, we hope that when rank and file Labour members vote on the issue this week, that they will consider the case purely on the merits of the existential need for this country to remain as closely linked to our European neighbours as possible.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here