ONE OF Scotland’s largest local authorities has been warned it will be hit with a legal claim unless it immediately honours pensions promises made to female employees as part of an equal pay settlement.
In 2016 North Lanarkshire Council was ordered by government body the Scottish Public Pensions Agency to give all women the option of having their settlements treated as pensionable pay, leaving it liable for millions of pounds in back pension contributions.
Around 2,000 women chose to have their pensions recalculated, but despite paying their own additional contributions to North Lanarkshire in 2016 and 2017 are yet to have the value of their individual pensions readjusted.
READ MORE: Career average move works against councils in equal pay disputes
For those still in work this means they do not currently know what their retirement income will be, while for those already retired it means they are continuing to be underpaid.
Thompsons Solicitors lawyer Peter O’Donnell, who is representing 200 members of the GMB union who settled with North Lanarkshire, said the delay is unacceptable and if the pensions deal is not finalised by the end of this month he will be taking action on their behalf.
“If we have heard nothing by the end of March then we are looking at further action,” Mr O’Donnell said.
While the council is responsible for recalculating the women’s pension benefits, those calculations must then be approved by the Strathclyde Pension Fund, which is the relevant section of the Local Government Pension Scheme.
Mr O’Donnell said he would take action against one or the other “depending on where the fault lies”.
“If it’s with the council then we will sue for breach of contract,” he said. “If it lies with the pension fund then we will refer it to the Pensions Ombudsman.”
A spokeswoman for North Lanarkshire confirmed that the local authority is still working on its recalculations and has not yet passed any information or money onto the Strathclyde Pension Fund.
“The council is fully committed to meeting its equal pay obligations,” she said.
“The volume of claims in this case, and the complexity of the information requiring to be exchanged with Strathclyde Pension Fund, means the process has taken longer than we had hoped.
“However, we are working hard to resolve any outstanding issues and expect to be able to complete the process shortly.”
READ MORE: Career average move works against councils in equal pay disputes
At £130 million North Lanarkshire - Scotland’s largest local authority after Glasgow City Council, the City Of Edinburgh Council and Fife Council - has so far paid out more than any other Scottish council to settle equal pay claims.
The pensions issue relates to the so-called second-wave of claims, which came after a 2006 pay deal designed to iron out historical discrepancies between what men and women were paid for work of equal value was itself found to be discriminatory.
The amount paid out by North Lanarkshire will be dwarfed by what Glasgow is likely to have to pay to settle its own second-wave disputes.
Earlier this year Glasgow agreed to negotiate a settlement with 11,500 current and former female workers rather than continue to fight them in the courts.
It has been estimated that settling the claims could cost the council up to £500m, but that figure is likely to rise significantly because those representing the women are demanding that all back payments qualify as pensionable pay.
Stefan Cross QC of Action 4 Equality Scotland, which is acting for 7,500 women, said that pensions “would be red line”, adding that if settlements are "not pensionable then we won’t have an agreement”.
Trade unions the GMB and Unison, which are each representing in the region of 2,000 Glasgow claimants, are taking the same stance.
READ MORE: Career average move works against councils in equal pay disputes
GMB Scotland organiser Hazel Nolan said that pensions are “a huge part of our claim” because “what the women get back in pensions could be larger than their payout”.
Unison regional manager Peter Hunter added that the union would be insisting in negotiations “that the claimants get information about their rights to get it treated as pensionable pay”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel