BY JAMES MCENANEY
Scottish universities are being urged to change the way they select students in a bid to increase the number of disabled people accessing higher education.
The One in Five campaign, which is backed by all Scotland’s major political parties, has written to universities to ask for disability to be recognised as a fundamental part of the admissions process.
According to a 2017 report by the Scottish Funding Council, only four of the country’s 18 universities consider disability as a factor in the contextualised admissions process, which helps identify students who may have faced challenges because of their upbringing.
READ MORE: Disabled campaigner finally sees eight year campaign end in victory
Figures show there is a disproportionately low number of students with disabilities currently studying at university, with just 11.5 per cent of full-time students identified as disabled. Some 20 per cent of the overall population are considered to have a disability.
Universities said they were open to discussing the issue, but added that contextualised admissions were mainly focused on socio-economic barriers, with other policies in place to identify disabled students.
However, the One in Five campaign argued that having a disability often meant students had lower attainment rates than their non-disabled peers.
Pam Duncan-Glancy, a co-founder of One in Five, said disabled people were too often left behind in work and education.
She added: “University gave me the best chance in life I could have and I want that for more disabled people. The gap between admission rates of disabled and non-disabled people shows we have a way to go.
“By default, we are losing out and we need to fix that by design. Using disability as a contextual criteria on admissions is a way to do this and I hope all universities will consider it.”
Student body NUS Scotland has backed the call.
Disabled students’ officer Lainey McKinley said: “We know that institutions have duties to make reasonable adjustments for disabled students once they’re in the door, but that isn’t the full story.
“Universities are rightly, and increasingly, making use of contextualised admissions when considering under-represented groups.
“We need to see this work built on – and we support any measures by Scotland’s universities to better recognise the barriers that disabled applicants face.”
READ MORE: Disabled campaigner finally sees eight year campaign end in victory
A spokeswoman for Universities Scotland said institutions welcomed applications from people with disabilities and encouraged disclosures during the admissions process so they could make reasonable adjustments.
She said: “At a sector level, the number of full-time students doing an undergraduate degree reporting a disability has increased steadily from 2010, but we recognise that this does not fully reflect disability in the population as a whole.
“Universities take their responsibilities to disability equality, and that of other protected characteristics, very seriously. This is covered through formal policies, monitoring and reporting.
“As disability covers a very wide and complex range of physical and mental conditions, it’s very important to work with the individual applicant to understand their circumstances and what support they need, from admissions onwards.
READ MORE: Disabled campaigner finally sees eight year campaign end in victory
“Scotland’s universities use contextual admissions, including adjusting grades, to widen access for those from deprived backgrounds because there is a very strong and causal link between deprivation and educational attainment. Socio-economic disadvantage is not covered under the equality act, so we are working in different ways to address that.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel