Labour's Holyrood group has been told by its former health minister that it has to become more positive and face up to being in opposition.
Susan Deacon, who stood down as the Labour MSP for Edinburgh East and Musselburgh at the May election, said her former colleagues have been too slow to find their feet in opposition.
"It took some time for the Scottish parliamentary group to get to grips with the fact they were no longer in power," she said, in a BBC interview.
"Labour has to develop a more positive, narrative that defines it as a party and Scotland in a UK context. I fail to understand why it was thought an effective strategy during the election to take such a negative stance and scaremonger about what would happen if the SNP were elected."
The former MSP has become the professor of social change at Queen Margaret University, and has been restrained in her comments about the Labour Party since she stood down as an MSP.
But her radio interview is a contribution to a post-election debate that has hardly any other contributors from within Labour ranks. Apart from media commentators and one article by justice spokeswoman Margaret Curran, the only assessment of what went wrong for Labour on May 3 became public through the leaking to The Herald of a memo by one of Jack McConnell's former special advisers.
That also said that Labour had been relentlessly negative and failed to provide an aspirational message about making Scotland a better place.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article