Chris Packham has criticised politicians for their “embarrassing” response to the plastics crisis.
The issue of plastic pollution caused a public outcry after Blue Planet II, narrated by Sir David Attenborough.
Now Springwatch star Packham, 56, has written in The Big Issue that he “nearly wept” at the Government’s plan to improve the environment.
“They are not going to fix things at this point in time. Recently, our government published its 25-year plan for the environment.
“God help us. Words, most of the important ones missing, and target dates set so long into the future I nearly wept. And to think we paid for it too,” he added.
“It is frankly embarrassing that so many of us realise the gravity of the environmental crisis and yet our elected representatives are almost invariably – there are exceptions – not engaging at all.”
Packham said it was “down to us” to tackle the issue, adding: “It is about do-it-yourself. And if we don’t do it, then we are just doing ourselves in.”
He called on customers to complain to staff in shops about packaging.
“When you go shopping, avoid excessive packaging. And if you can’t, politely tell the staff that you resent not having a choice to do so,” he said.
“Dump the use of single use water bottles or coffee cups, buy a personal reuseable one, use it, wash it, reuse it.”
He said of politicians: “None even want to acknowledge that the single most dangerous threat to our planet is that there are too many humans on it. Too difficult, not a vote winner”.
The Government earmarked a £61.4 million war chest to fight the rising tide of plastic pollution in the world’s oceans earlier this month.
And it published its 25-year plan on the environment in January.
The Big Issue is on sale from Monday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel